His workrate was prtty high for Pavlik and Pascal IMO. He threw more in those fights than Calzaghe as a guess.
Any got stats?
same thing with Pavlik
good but not as good as people thought
Hopkins stays in shape for his age, deserves some credit
but active fighter will make him act his age
he didn't work much against Joe since Joe flurried a lot
calzaghe is an atg that throws 100 lighting fast punches a round and applies constant pressue..that style will make anyone look bad..expecially an aging fighter..common sense
Pascal got overrated for beating Dawson
Hopkins still old, but even old Hopkins>Pascal
This is pretty much it; Pascal is overrated. Pascal victory over Dawson was a fluke. Pascal beat a distracted Dawson. The rematch will show that when Dawson fights Pascal and wins. An Old Hopkins is better than Pascal; Hopkins is a far better technical fighter than Pascal.
same thing with Pavlik
good but not as good as people thought
Hopkins stays in shape for his age, deserves some credit
but active fighter will make him act his age
he didn't work much against Joe since Joe flurried a lot
To continue the point above, Hopkins avoided fighters that are active and technical...that is why he never fought Dawson...too much risk no reward. Whereas a Calzaghe brings more reward with the risk. Hopkins paid for that.
Comment