Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Merchant: Mosley The Most Dangerous Choice For Pacquiao

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #81
    Originally posted by Pullcounter View Post
    1) give a link prior to mosley/mayweather where I said mosley was old. if not, then STFU

    2) never said mosley was more viable than jmm, so STFU. as is, both fights suck.

    3) wifebeater knows he'll get beat up by pac, hence the extended vacation
    1. Nothing you say is insightful enough to save.

    2. You claim a Mosley that hasn't won a fight in two years and was lucky to get a draw against Sergio friggin' Mora is more dangerous than a JMM who's already kicked Pac's ass at leats once and won his last two fights.

    3. You and the other Pacwh*res are the only ones who think Pac will beat Mayweather. Most trainers, fighters, and people who actually understand boxing know its a laughable mismatch.

    BTW, you're simply a Pacwh*re and know little to nothing about boxing.

    Comment


      #82
      Originally posted by BoxingScenery View Post
      This fight is really exposing a lot of people, no one specifically, just fans. When Mayweather was scheduled to fight Mosley, Mosley was depicted as even more dangerous than Pacquiao, by several media sources and even by the Mayweathers (check interviews during that time). As soon as Mosley lost he became "old" (which is the ******est thing ever, cuz 38 wasn't young in the first place). One year later, a 39 year old Shane will step in the ring with Pacquiao, and all of a sudden the tables are turned, some say he's not dangerous and he's old, and other say he's old but still dangerous/not coming off a 15 month layoff. This fight doesn't make either fan base look any good.
      This includes me, I've thought Shane should hang em up, but how can I say that when he faced a defensive wizard in Floyd Mayweather Jr....that was completely unfair of me, and unfortunately way too premature of an assessment....continuing, Mora doesn't display the same defensiveness that Floyd does but his movement troubled Shane, if anybody thinks Pacquiao is a defensive first fighter, well, I ask, you rethink your answer.

      I've rejected this fight not b/c Shane is old. I've stressed it before the Mayweather fight, after the Mayweather fight and I'll say it again, Shane isn't young, but he is a legitimate welterweight, with good pop, veteran smarts, well developed, all in all dangerous for anybody, but **** No! I don't wanna see this fight ONLY b/c of Shane's performances in his past two bouts. With that said, I still expect this fight to be a lot better than some would like to depict it....so **** it, it's almost signed, that's it, no point in *****ing about it any longer...
      You sir, talk a lot of sense. Thank you for that refreshing and insightful post!

      Comment


        #83
        Originally posted by BoxingScenery View Post
        This fight is really exposing a lot of people, no one specifically, just fans. When Mayweather was scheduled to fight Mosley, Mosley was depicted as even more dangerous than Pacquiao, by several media sources and even by the Mayweathers (check interviews during that time). As soon as Mosley lost he became "old" (which is the ******est thing ever, cuz 38 wasn't young in the first place). One year later, a 39 year old Shane will step in the ring with Pacquiao, and all of a sudden the tables are turned, some say he's not dangerous and he's old, and other say he's old but still dangerous/not coming off a 15 month layoff. This fight doesn't make either fan base look any good.
        This includes me, I've thought Shane should hang em up, but how can I say that when he faced a defensive wizard in Floyd Mayweather Jr....that was completely unfair of me, and unfortunately way too premature of an assessment....continuing, Mora doesn't display the same defensiveness that Floyd does but his movement troubled Shane, if anybody thinks Pacquiao is a defensive first fighter, well, I ask, you rethink your answer.

        I've rejected this fight not b/c Shane is old. I've stressed it before the Mayweather fight, after the Mayweather fight and I'll say it again, Shane isn't young, but he is a legitimate welterweight, with good pop, veteran smarts, well developed, all in all dangerous for anybody, but **** No! I don't wanna see this fight ONLY b/c of Shane's performances in his past two bouts. With that said, I still expect this fight to be a lot better than some would like to depict it....so **** it, it's almost signed, that's it, no point in *****ing about it any longer...
        Mosley si the same old fart he was for Mayweather. The only difference is he was coming off a signature KO win when he fought Money. He's coming off being lucky to get a draw against Sergio friggin Mora fighting Pac. Mosley's looked like **** basically since losing to Forrest. But, he's been overrated for nearly a decade now simply because those in IHateMayweatherville wanted to claim Money was ducking a top fighter. Either way, he's probably no worse now than he was for Money. But, since he was the P4P #3, top welter, and coming off a signature performacne, he was a much more legitimate opponent for Money than he is for Pac.

        Comment


          #84
          I think JMM would beat Mosley myself.

          Comment


            #85
            Originally posted by BoxingScenery View Post
            This fight is really exposing a lot of people, no one specifically, just fans. When Mayweather was scheduled to fight Mosley, Mosley was depicted as even more dangerous than Pacquiao, by several media sources and even by the Mayweathers (check interviews during that time). As soon as Mosley lost he became "old" (which is the ******est thing ever, cuz 38 wasn't young in the first place). One year later, a 39 year old Shane will step in the ring with Pacquiao, and all of a sudden the tables are turned, some say he's not dangerous and he's old, and other say he's old but still dangerous/not coming off a 15 month layoff. This fight doesn't make either fan base look any good.
            This includes me, I've thought Shane should hang em up, but how can I say that when he faced a defensive wizard in Floyd Mayweather Jr....that was completely unfair of me, and unfortunately way too premature of an assessment....continuing, Mora doesn't display the same defensiveness that Floyd does but his movement troubled Shane, if anybody thinks Pacquiao is a defensive first fighter, well, I ask, you rethink your answer.

            I've rejected this fight not b/c Shane is old. I've stressed it before the Mayweather fight, after the Mayweather fight and I'll say it again, Shane isn't young, but he is a legitimate welterweight, with good pop, veteran smarts, well developed, all in all dangerous for anybody, but **** No! I don't wanna see this fight ONLY b/c of Shane's performances in his past two bouts. With that said, I still expect this fight to be a lot better than some would like to depict it....so **** it, it's almost signed, that's it, no point in *****ing about it any longer...
            That doesn't mean you have to buy the fight!! This is why they keep doing this ****. Some people will buy pac's fight regardless. The only thing that will stop the madness is if Mosley catches Pac. If Mosley wobbles Pac he can finish him. Pac doesn't have the smartness to defend himself he just lays on the ropes. Which is how guys get knocked out. With that said I can hope for that to happen but i'm not putting out $60 just to see the opposite.

            Comment


              #86
              Originally posted by hitking View Post
              1. Nothing you say is insightful enough to save.

              2. You claim a Mosley that hasn't won a fight in two years and was lucky to get a draw against Sergio friggin' Mora is more dangerous than a JMM who's already kicked Pac's ass at leats once and won his last two fights.

              3. You and the other Pacwh*res are the only ones who think Pac will beat Mayweather. Most trainers, fighters, and people who actually understand boxing know its a laughable mismatch.

              BTW, you're simply a Pacwh*re and know little to nothing about boxing.
              Don't forget all of Pac and Mayweather's common opponents pick Mayweather to win the fight. We can soon add Mosley to that list as well.

              Comment


                #87
                Originally posted by Iceta Lives View Post
                I think JMM would beat Mosley myself.
                JMM is a better fighter. And even though he's great technically and an even better counter puncher, he's no defensive wizard. So I think Mosley could hit him early. If he can handle the thunder, he'll beat Mosley. If he can't, he'll get KO'd. Whether he'd lose to Mosley or Berto or was wasted by Mayweather is irrelevant. He's one of the top 5 P4P fighters in the sport, already beaten Pac at least in most people's minds, and willing to fight at Pacs' perferred weight (for this fight at least.) Pac needs to fight him. No matter how many excuses his legions of wh*res pull outta there vaginas, espeically the "men."

                Comment


                  #88
                  Originally posted by Tweezy316 View Post
                  Don't forget all of Pac and Mayweather's common opponents pick Mayweather to win the fight. We can soon add Mosley to that list as well.
                  I personally don't care about the predictions. I was just using Pull Counter's Pacwh*re logic against him. He excuses Pac for not fighting JMM simply because he thinks Pac would waste him. Yet, he calls Mayweather a coward for "ducking" Pac in his mind when most knowledgeable fight people not willing to take a facial from Pac and 100 cats of his choosing think Money wipes his ass with Pac. If Pac doesn't need to fight JMM, Mayweather doesn't need to fight Pac, according to his twisted Pacwh*re logic.

                  Comment


                    #89
                    He's right.

                    Mosley is dangerous in the way that he's most likely to KO Pac.

                    He's also the most likely to gas out after 2 rounds and lose.

                    A garbage fight is a garbage fight.

                    At least Merchant admits Pac-JMM is a more interesting fight.

                    Comment


                      #90
                      Originally posted by Tweezy316 View Post
                      That doesn't mean you have to buy the fight!! This is why they keep doing this ****. Some people will buy pac's fight regardless. The only thing that will stop the madness is if Mosley catches Pac. If Mosley wobbles Pac he can finish him. Pac doesn't have the smartness to defend himself he just lays on the ropes. Which is how guys get knocked out. With that said I can hope for that to happen but i'm not putting out $60 just to see the opposite.
                      you see man, that's the difference between me and you, I watch fights to see who wins, you watch fights to see someone lose. Your method to resolve this "madness" is to see Pac lose, that's not the way I think at all. I can't really say it bothers me, but I get slightly annoyed when I hear fans wanting Pacquiao or Mayweather to lose, b/c they don't quite comprehend how important these two are for the sport of boxing, and how much they've done for the sport. And no I'm not buying the fight, but I'm still watching it, and I hope it's f'in dope fight.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP