Looking back on this whole mess got me thinking.
Im convinced when Haye went to HW he had every intention of fighting the brothers. Then he changed his mind.
He signed to fight Wlad, the deal was done, and fight night was approaching. Then Haye pulls out with a mystery back injury. Then Setanta goes bust about 1 day later. It was highly publicised that Setanta was going under before it was announced. Haye wouldve known he wouldnt get paid for the fight. Haye's initial deal with Wald was apparently he got all the UK money, Wlad got everything else. He's not gonna fight Wlad for free. I can understand that. (the rest i cant understand though)
Wlad keeps the date and fights Chageuv, so Vitali and Haye enter talks. At a meeting the famous ****zine cover of the decapitated head gets thrown on the table, and Vitali loses it. A reminder of the story below.
As far as we all know the fight is almost a done deal, then all of a sudden Haye decides to fight Valeuv instead (who he stated when he moved to HW he had no interest in). And has turned down deals to fight the klitschkos since then.
Did Haye **** himself when Vitali got hold of him and he realised he took the whole trash talking to far with the photo of Vitali's brothers ecapitated head?
Did he realise he bit of more than he could chew?
And also as an after-thought, as i was writing this i noticed that (i think) his initial deal with Wlad was for him to keep all the UK money and Wlad to get everything else. He still wants that (along with 50% of everywhere else not including Germany which would go to Wlad) and that is his current excuse for not fighting.
As far as I (and almost everyone else) is concerned the current 50-50 all the way deal is good for Haye, probably more than he deserves. But it was something that i think was agreed in the 1st negotiations with Wlad, is Haye justified in asking for that again? Could he, for example, keep 100% of the UK money (which would be a lot more than he wouldve got from Setanta) and let one of the Klitschko brothers keep 100% of everyting else instead?
Im more interested in peoples thoughts about whether Haye bricked it when Vitali grabbed him by the throat or not than the deal he wants to fight them now. I just added that in at the end as it only occured to me as I was writing it.
Im convinced when Haye went to HW he had every intention of fighting the brothers. Then he changed his mind.
He signed to fight Wlad, the deal was done, and fight night was approaching. Then Haye pulls out with a mystery back injury. Then Setanta goes bust about 1 day later. It was highly publicised that Setanta was going under before it was announced. Haye wouldve known he wouldnt get paid for the fight. Haye's initial deal with Wald was apparently he got all the UK money, Wlad got everything else. He's not gonna fight Wlad for free. I can understand that. (the rest i cant understand though)
Wlad keeps the date and fights Chageuv, so Vitali and Haye enter talks. At a meeting the famous ****zine cover of the decapitated head gets thrown on the table, and Vitali loses it. A reminder of the story below.
As far as we all know the fight is almost a done deal, then all of a sudden Haye decides to fight Valeuv instead (who he stated when he moved to HW he had no interest in). And has turned down deals to fight the klitschkos since then.
Did Haye **** himself when Vitali got hold of him and he realised he took the whole trash talking to far with the photo of Vitali's brothers ecapitated head?
Did he realise he bit of more than he could chew?
And also as an after-thought, as i was writing this i noticed that (i think) his initial deal with Wlad was for him to keep all the UK money and Wlad to get everything else. He still wants that (along with 50% of everywhere else not including Germany which would go to Wlad) and that is his current excuse for not fighting.
As far as I (and almost everyone else) is concerned the current 50-50 all the way deal is good for Haye, probably more than he deserves. But it was something that i think was agreed in the 1st negotiations with Wlad, is Haye justified in asking for that again? Could he, for example, keep 100% of the UK money (which would be a lot more than he wouldve got from Setanta) and let one of the Klitschko brothers keep 100% of everyting else instead?
Im more interested in peoples thoughts about whether Haye bricked it when Vitali grabbed him by the throat or not than the deal he wants to fight them now. I just added that in at the end as it only occured to me as I was writing it.
Comment