Comments Thread For: Mayweather-Pacquiao; Drug Testing No Longer an Issue

[-EX-]

u on vacation too?

I'm always on vacation...

[bluetuazon]

Pacquiao vs. Chavez Jr.


That fight is so damn obvious to me.

impossible....unless u break roach into 2.....

[bluetuazon]

Floyd beating old man mosley who whipped Cheato who was caught using illegal hand wraps.

Manny fights the P4P #21 loser of the loser of Floyd. BRAVE.

Blood testing makes Manny weak, but not Floyd.

Manny 'accepts' when Floyds taking time off or after Manny already has another fight lined up.

triangle theories again??? i thought this **** is old?? cmon now man!! lol

[Blubba]

triangle theories again??? i thought this **** is old?? cmon now man!! lol

thats a nice avatar did that girl take extra blood test lol!

[crillz]

where exactly in my post did i say schaeffer co-signed whatever pac had said? you keep on repeating yourself like a parrot...i simply said marley quoted schaeffer. now is that quote of any relevance? in a way yes because we all know how schaeffer has been negative when it comes to pac in the past. now he's saying something like pac can't lie. whereas before he even denied that there was a 2nd negotiation notwithstanding that hbo confirmed it. could it be that he really knows something that transpired in that negotiation hmm? maybe he just denied the negotiation before because he was trying to defend floyd's decision to go on vacation. but after floyd's trysts with don king that may jeopardize their relationship with floyd, schaeffer is now beginning to change his tune. now he only says good things about pac. sounds fishy i should say.

also i didn't say in my post that drug testing is no longer an issue. but certainly, news like that should be taken with positive reactions for people who wants to see the fight. and while everyone else are taking 2 steps forward, you and the other *****s are taking a backward stance. that's why i wonder if you guys really wanna see the fight. i think you don't.

you know what's funny? if marley is a biased writer in favor of top rank and pac, which i think he is, then he's surely doing a disservice (if in case he's lying) because he's putting pac on spot...a spot where he can't have an option in the future. i'm sure you and the other *****s are gonna pull out this marley article in the future if pac says no to ost. you're going to be very thankful for this marley article because you can use it as a tool to condemn pac. but that will only happen of course if marley's quote of pac is a lie. if it's true indeed that drug testing will no longer be an issue then we should all be happy because the fight is finally happening, don't you think?

if you even bothered to read what I wrote you'd know that I wasn't accusing YOU of saying Schaefer co-signed anything I was talking strictly about Michael Moron's idiotic claim that by Schaefer saying what he said he co signed Manny being willing to take the tests and has been willing, it doesn't prove that at all which was the whole point to my post

this whole article from this imbecile Michael Moron was put out there to create the perception that both sides agreed on the testing yet where is Mayweather at? where is Mayweather saying "Yes Manny agreed" and where is Manny saying "yes I agreed"? it's not there, this whole buzz that is going on here right now about Manny agreeing to FULL testing is all due to some biased guy's word

Manny probably DID say what Marley said that he said and same with Richard Schaefer he probably said that too but MY problem is that Marley takes Richard's words out of context, adds his own meaning to it and reports it to the general public as solid facts when in fact they are not. Richard saying "if Pacquiao said that, then I'm sure he wouldn't lie about it" is only Richard's opinion on whether or not he thinks Pacquiao would lie, he didn't say "Pacquiao said that, I'm sure he isn't lie about it" he theorized that "IF Pacquiao said that, THEN I'm sure he WOULDN'T lie about it" which isn't an admission in ANY way shape or form whatsoever, people are just speculating and using their own perceptions and opinions to try and produce facts and it just doesn't work that way

you think that just because he is a writer that I'm supposed to just concede my thoughts and act as if I just simply don't know ****? nah man I'm not you son I wont do that because I spend too much time keeping up with this stuff and I do it for the love not for a pay check unlike these guys. it's plain to see that Michael Moron took Schaefer's words out of context, he clearly made it seem to be something it ultimately was not, he took this -->"if Pacquiao said that, then I'm sure he wouldn't lie about it"<-- and somehow convinced people that both sides agreed to testing and that's so bull **** it literally upsets me, I mean it when I say Michael Marley and others who report Boxing do not deserve their jobs.

and then to make it worse he quotes Schaefer and doesn't quote Pacquiao, why didn't you quote Manny? because his quote would have been as full of **** as the quote Schaefer gave you? ****ing biased prick. don't call me a damn ***** neither @sshole because I respect the **** out of Manny Pacquiao, Top Rank NO but Manny Pacquiao YES I DO respect him I just choose not to walk around with his 3rd leg buried up my ass is all and I choose to still weigh the facts

[DiLLiNGER]

Cotto>>>Mosley

Yes that was before Cotto became damaged goods,but nice try tho,and just think about it what would of happened if cotto had a proper coach when he fought pacquiao,he was damaged goods without a coach in the corner,not very hard to beat such a fighter

Pacquiao is good at fighting dehydrated fighters and shot fighters.

Roach himself said it before each and every fight that the opponent was either shot,damaged goods,couldn't pull the trigger anymore,past his prime..those are the words of the man you all seem to admire...

with him saying that I don't understand why you guys praise a guy who's beating all those fighters who we really should feel sorry for.

And nice of him fighting floyds left overs too

[Blubba]

Yes that was before Cotto became damaged goods,but nice try tho,and just think about it what would of happened if cotto had a proper coach when he fought pacquiao,he was damaged goods without a coach in the corner,not very hard to beat such a fighter

Pacquiao is good at fighting dehydrated fighters and shot fighters.

Roach himself said it before each and every fight that the opponent was either shot,damaged goods,couldn't pull the trigger anymore,past his prime..those are the words of the man you all seem to admire...

with him saying that I don't understand why you guys praise a guy who's beating all those fighters who we really should feel sorry for.

And nice of him fighting floyds left overs too

but roach is full of **** why u believe him.

[bluetuazon]

thats a nice avatar did that girl take extra blood test lol!

nah...holm never agreed to any of the gay ass request of lil floydie...ost my ass...if ur a fighter..ur job is to fight....unless u work in the commision who makes the rules...

floyd is a talented mofo man...but he punked out to a supposed to be "one dimensional" fighter according to floyd SR...if he was one dimensional and has poor defense then lil floyd should have no problem beating him...but the floydie punked out and would rather pop his baby momma than fightin pac...

[DiLLiNGER]

but roach is full of **** why u believe him.

Roach did speak the truth with what he said about those fighters and I knew that before he said it,it's just weird that he's discrediting his own fighter that's all

He also spoke the truth when he said NO to a shane mosley fight because he was too good of a fighter

[Blubba]

Roach did speak the truth with what he said about those fighters and I knew that before he said it,it's just weird that he's discrediting his own fighter that's all

He also spoke the truth when he said NO to a shane mosley fight because he was too good of a fighter

roach is the truth. like he said pacman wud beat floyd.