Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Doug Fischer: "Wlad Klitschko would've been dangerous to ANYBODY in history even Ali"

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #51
    Originally posted by Wlad Klitschko View Post
    Actually Wlad's never been K.O.d Hes always gotten up. And Sanders is a bum? A guy who was 41-3 before hitting 40 was a bum? Ali never fought someone as big and as tall as Sanders...in his career.
    And besides Rahman, who had Sanders fought?

    Check Ernie Terrell's stats as well as Cleveland Williams. And quit talking out of your backside.

    Comment


      #52
      I gotta bow out. This is too ****** and I am getting mash up with red k for stating facts. lol

      Comment


        #53

        Comment


          #54
          Originally posted by Tim Horton View Post
          pure rubbish.

          Now Wlad has a better jab than Larry Holmes?
          Wlad's jab is much more powerful than Holmes's. According to people on here its the only punch wlad throws and yet his KO ratio, against better competition.

          Did you know that in this millenium Wlad has only fought one fighter with over 4 losses? Hasim Rahman. Just one.

          Look at Holmes' title reign. Other than guys who beat a past it Ali, and old bums can you recognize anyone he fought? Marvelous Marvis Frazier? Scott Frank? Renaldo "wesley" Snipes? Bad Leroy Brown Jones?

          Seriously, people say this HW division is bad...look no further than Holmes' era to find a far far worse HW division.

          Comment


            #55
            the problem with the current version of wlad (not the one ko'ed by sanders & brewster) is that he can never have the competition that those former heavyweight champs have faced in their careers, so it's hard to assess his chances against them. obviously wlad has the size and i think his skills can matchup well with those former champs. but so far wlad has only showcased his skills against inferior opponents. how would he react if faced against a equally skillful fighter? is his heart big enough to compete? we'll never know.

            Comment


              #56
              Originally posted by Tim Horton View Post
              And besides Rahman, who had Sanders fought?

              Check Ernie Terrell's stats as well as Cleveland Williams. And quit talking out of your backside.
              Wait wait wait. Cleveland Williams? Before or after being shot in the stomach by a state trooper? Cause he was 13-8 after being shot by a state trooper. And of his 13 wins after being shot, only 5 had double digit wins themselves...

              Or Terrell who lost twice to a fighter, more bum than Wlad has ever fought. A fighter who literally ended their career witha 16-10 record....beat Terrell twice. Two times. 16-10 and 2 wins against Terrell..yep atg there.

              Comment


                #57
                Originally posted by brick wall View Post
                the problem with the current version of wlad (not the one ko'ed by sanders & brewster) is that he can never have the competition that those former heavyweight champs have faced in their careers, so it's hard to assess his chances against them. obviously wlad has the size and i think his skills can matchup well with those former champs. but so far wlad has only showcased his skills against inferior opponents. how would he react if faced against a equally skillful fighter? is his heart big enough to compete? we'll never know.
                People say Ali when he was banned was the greatest fighter of all time....and he never fought anyone. Or Holmes? Who did Holmes beat? The same Ali that Berbick and Spinks beat? Wow, great competition. Or Bowe? Bowe fought Holy, that was it. Golata beat him down. He also ducked Tyson and Lewis.

                Comment


                  #58
                  Originally posted by Tim Horton View Post
                  Wlad was never KO'd? OMFG.

                  TKO = technically knocked out. Key words: knocked out.
                  Say that to people in the history section who say Shavers hit harder than Briggs, because although Briggs has more KO's than Shavers, more in the first round, more in the first two rounds etc...Shavers hit harder because he scored KO's and not TKOs.

                  Comment


                    #59
                    Originally posted by Wlad Klitschko View Post
                    A few inch height disadvantage isnt much for someone with Ali's skills? Really? Howd Ali do against the only fighter an inch taller than him who weighed more...Joe Bugner? I mean a 23 year old less skilled, less powerful, less big, less tall Bugner took Ali to the wire...but no, Ali would have no problem with Wlad? Outta here troll. Use some references rather than your imagination. He would be looking at over a 3 inch height disadvantage.

                    Foreman would struggle mightily with Wlad. Wlad would make Foreman look small. Wlad would use his jab to frustrate Foreman. Also, Wlads been knocked down, but never unconcious, hes always gotten up.

                    Frazier beating Wlad...ok...im done here. Cant argue with people like this.
                    Why you mad? Name one boxer Wlad has faced that was on the level of a prime Tyson, Ali, Holyfield, Lewis, Bowe, Foreman? This isnt cause they are american either. Were they hispanic, chinese wouldnt matter. Guys on the list some were conditioned togo 15 rounds. These were also tough HWs who were actually skilled. I like Wlad and i think he makes these fights competitive but i think he loses to all them no offense. These guys in their prime were great.. and too skilled..

                    Comment


                      #60

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP