Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Hopkins dont belong w/ SRR,Monzon,Hagler,etc.

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by Bozo_no_no
    IGNORANT Post.

    At 40 years old, any middleweight in history could have lost 5-7 rounds agaisnt Taylor.

    Who are you to make that call like it's a fact?
    He's a dumb ****, thats what he is

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by SoCaL_951
      robinson,monzon,hagler,hearns,leonard,lamotta,etc, would have never lost to someone like taylor, i'm not saying hopkins is lame but he just happens to be at the right time in history to dominate his division, if he fought in those days he would of lost to all of them, he would of put up a fight but would of lost eventually, he definately did not turn old tonight, he closed the show strong but wasnt enough to win the fight so he has no excuses for losing to taylor, he should have convincingly beat taylor tonight, therefore i see no way he wins a rematch, taylor wins the rematch by comfortable decision.
      You're a ****in fool.

      novice.

      Comment


        #13
        Leonard....was a welterweight who got lucky vs a past his prime Hagler

        Have not seen much of Monzon or Lamotta.

        Hagler would have an easy time with Hopkins. Hagler is better than Hopkins in every single possible category. He is even good at cheating if it comes to that. Vs Roldan he stuck his thumb in Roldan's eye and it changed the complexion of the entire fight. Alot of people think of Hagler only as a brawler with an Iron chin but he was beautifull boxer, with a good jab, good movement, good defence, good handspeed, alot of ring savy. I dont see any way Hopkins could beat Hagler.

        Comment

        Working...
        X
        TOP