Dan Rafael: "David Haye still REFUSED a 50-50 deal with no future stipulations"

[SuckaPunch]

"With heavyweight titlist David Haye avoiding a showdown with unified champion Wladimir Klitschko, whom he's called out for the past couple of years, in order to fight English countryman Audley Harrison instead -- British media is reporting that Harrison has agreed to an offer for a Nov. 13 fight -- Klitschko intends to go forward with his mandatory defense against Alexander Povetkin. The IBF would have allowed Klitschko to delay the mandatory in order to make the unification bout, but Haye declined an offer that would have seen him get a 50-50 deal without having to yield options on future bouts. Klitschko's camp asked the IBF this week to order a purse bid for the Povetkin fight. The IBF set the bid for June 29. The fight must take place within 90 days of the bid."

- Dan Rafael

[Chuckguy]

Haye fought a true HW in the boring man Ruiz and didnt like what he tasted so he is running scared of Vlad like a little cha cha
*** off Haye go back to cruiser!

[JK1700]

I have lost respect for Haye but Dan Rafael is not a good source.

[BostonGuy]

I have lost respect for Haye but Dan Rafael is not a good source.

Explain.....
________

[JK1700]

[/B]

Explain.....

I mean it in that he always gives his opinion whilst hiding the truth. For example with the whole Mayweather-Pacquiao he is asked who he thought was at fault for the fight not happening and said "Mayweather demanded different testing, He didnt demand this of any other opponent". What he said is true but he dodged the original question. Mayweather requesting testing does not kill the fight, Pacquiao refusing testing kills the fight. Dan knows this but chose to give his opinion on Mayweather as apposed to responding to the original question.

He does this with alot of things. I consider him to be very biased.

[JK1700]

[/B]

Explain.....

I mean it in that he always gives his opinion whilst hiding the truth. For example with the whole Mayweather-Pacquiao he is asked who he thought was at fault for the fight not happening and said "Mayweather demanded different testing, He didnt demand this of any other opponent". What he said is true but he dodged the original question. Mayweather requesting testing does not kill the fight, Pacquiao refusing testing kills the fight. Dan knows this but chose to give his opinion on Mayweather as apposed to responding to the original question.

He does this with alot of things. I consider him to be very biased.

It's different with this article though. He says the truth here.

Not just his opinion. (What he usually does)

[Davros?]

He is just quoting what it said in the Mail which is a rubbish source, If Haye does fight Harrison i will be supporting the A-Force as its a ***** move by Haye.

[STRUGG]

haye just loss a fan...........................he is turning into a "MAYWEATHER"..................

[Ryn0]

If he fights Harrison then he's lost all respect from me.

[JM1]

"With heavyweight titlist David Haye avoiding a showdown with unified champion Wladimir Klitschko, whom he's called out for the past couple of years, in order to fight English countryman Audley Harrison instead -- British media is reporting that Harrison has agreed to an offer for a Nov. 13 fight -- Klitschko intends to go forward with his mandatory defense against Alexander Povetkin. The IBF would have allowed Klitschko to delay the mandatory in order to make the unification bout, but Haye declined an offer that would have seen him get a 50-50 deal without having to yield options on future bouts. Klitschko's camp asked the IBF this week to order a purse bid for the Povetkin fight. The IBF set the bid for June 29. The fight must take place within 90 days of the bid."

- Dan Rafael

haye doesnt want the fight, simple as that. i dont know how his fans will defend him now