Pure Boxers Have Always Ruled Boxing

[jrosales13]

This thread only proves I'm dealing with fragile minds. U kids dont know **** about boxing or higher order thinking, u cant grasp that most of our boxing terminology is theoretical not empirical.

Are you trying to be Roger Mayweather now like that day you was trying to be Floyd Jr?

[jrosales13]

Supposedly M.I.C has been watching Floyd since '96. I doubt the dude was even out of diapers though.

Yea I doubt it too

[IMG]//img.***********.com/albums/v511/ummid/1276909072169.gif[/IMG]

Whoa WTF?

Wait, everyone agrees with the classic definition of pure boxer, you fight tooth and nail to disagree arguing "your" definition, yet we're fragile minded?

This thread proves you know jack **** and are too dumb to even realize it or are just plain too thick headed to admit you were wrong.

This is kinda like Sycomantz defending "his" definition of a decade. Then again, I haven't seen him around much since you joined....hmm coincidence?

Coincidence? I think not

LMAO!!!!!



MIC = the thing dancing

Truck = JRo's boxing knowledge

[jrosales13]

So how long do u think the classification boxer-puncher has been around, its some relatively new ish. Do u any of u even stop to think how silly the term boxer-puncher is? Aren't all boxers punchers?

No you're newish to the sport of boxing. Boxer-puncher is not newish at all...

Even the guy that you think is a pure boxer in SRR was known as a boxer-puncher not pure boxer.

[M.I.C.]

jrosales, seriously why are u overly concerned with an interpretation of a term? Is it that important to you that my definition is the same as yours? The term "pure" means more 2 me than u, Ok move on

[fdotorres]

In closing lets just say, I know what style historically dominates this sport, and you lil ******s do to, in case u dont know your going 2 that style once again on Nov 13. A pure boxer will dominate.

hahahahahha you're definitely *******ual

[ummeed]

hahahahahha you're definitely *******ual

that would be a bit tough to prove since MIC's interpretation of the word "*******ual" maybe different from everyone else's.

it's like everyone else is running windows/leopard/linux while he's running os/360, ITS, or some ****.

[M.I.C.]

Some of U throwing boxer-puncher at me as if its not a ridiculous classification. Dont all boxers punch? Every boxer is a puncher. With that said I hope u finally get its called independent thought.

[fdotorres]

jrosales, seriously why are u overly concerned with an interpretation of a term? Is it that important to you that my definition is the same as yours? The term "pure" means more 2 me than u, Ok move on

there is a definition established already. making up **** won't help you in any way

you said a pure boxer has it all. does calderon have power?

[jrosales13]

jrosales, seriously why are u overly concerned with an interpretation of a term? Is it that important to you that my definition is the same as yours? The term "pure" means more 2 me than u, Ok move on

Means more? How so?

When a week a go you hadn't yet seen of the best pure boxers of the decade.

Again by your interpretation how is Barrera not a pure boxer?

[M.I.C.]

hahahahahha you're definitely *******ual

I understand a majority of you *******s share the same brain, considering the size of Pac's dome, its easy.