Pure Boxers Have Always Ruled Boxing

[M.I.C.]

Such a ******ed ass post from top to bottom

As you can see azz hole, I wasn't done writing when the thread was posted, but I like how you go through commentary and look for the one line that u think u can make your smart azz comment. Good Work, u can keep that line, my gift to you.

[jrosales13]

Dude do I have to go through this with you?? You dont know **** but Manny Pacquiao so stick with what you know and get out of my grown folk conversation.

Again are you sure about that? You the one saying SRR was a pure boxer for the most part and I don't **** about boxing?



Explain how SRR was for the most part a pure boxer?

[jrosales13]

As you can see azz hole, I wasn't done writing when the thread was posted, but I like how you go through commentary and look for the one line that u think u can make your smart azz comment. Good Work, u can keep that line, my gift to you.

What did you have to finish. You said sluggers don't draw crowds.

[M.I.C.]

Again are you sure about that? You the one saying SRR was a pure boxer for the most part and I don't **** about boxing?



Explain who SRR was for the most part a pure boxer?

How about you read a few posts up where I clearly explain what a pure boxer means to me.

[The Comedian]

Roy Jones was in my opinion, pure boxing can also be unorthodox

naw man,you trippin if you say Roy was a pure boxer

[jrosales13]

How about you read a few posts up where I clearly explain what a pure boxer means to me.

But, that is not what a pure boxer is dumbass. Floyd is a pure boxer, SRR is not a pure boxer.

[jrosales13]

Ray Leonard was an overrated boxer but an underrated slugger.

[jrosales13]

naw man,you trippin if you say Roy was a pure boxer

The only real pure boxer he named was Floyd Mayweather.

[HyperUppercut]

All the fighters I named, even De La Hoya, are what I consider the heirs to Ray Robinson. All of these fighters fought in a pure boxing tradition that emphasized being good at everything, every skill, not just one. All of these fighters were good with speed, offense, defense, and had god gifted abilities. All of them fought behind their jabs, and only those who listen to the so called experts will say that Roy didn't fight behind his jab, that would be incorrect.

Roy had a very good jab and he used it often. Just cause he was fast enough to land lead left hooks doesn't mean he didn't use or develop his jab. Floyd either leads with the jab or the left hook as well. Its just another wrinkle in their game.

Also what the hell are categories like boxer puncher, puncher boxer etc...??? All around skills is what they have. Brawlers, sluggers, are generally limited at what they can do, and that is part of why they never achieve the fame and popularity of the all around pure boxers.

roy's stance was not a pure boxing stance, he often hung his head over his feet, he kept his hands very low and punched from unconventional angles. That is not a pure boxer you dingleberry. Would you say Sergio martinez is a pure boxer as well?????? I hope not.

[Boxin']

What did you have to finish. You said sluggers don't draw crowds.

I agree. That's why Pernell Whitaker was the biggest draw of his era.

If you mention Sweet Pea to a casual fan they always know everything about his career and how much money he made. When you mention Tyson, they are like "isn't that the guy Lewis KO'd?".