Originally posted by Deevel916
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Pure Boxers Have Always Ruled Boxing
Collapse
-
Originally posted by M.I.C. View PostYour point is so wack, Barrera has shoddy defense, slow feet, come on dude dont make up some **** about Barrera to try to credit it to me.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jrosales13 View PostYou haven't studied Calderon?
But, I thought you're the one who spills the truth and that I made a mistake in challenging you. And, you tell me that you really don't know who about Calderon? The best pure boxer in the last decade not named Mayweather and you have not studied him?
And, then you here telling me that I only know about Pac. And, that you have so much more knowledge then I do. And, yet you can't tell me about one of the best pure boxers in the last decade?
GTFOH... Sign off like you promised. Don't comeback. You know **** about boxing. About the history, about the styles you know ****.
Just cuz Barrera is Mexican does not mean he is a come forward fighter. JMM does not have that style nor did Salvador Sancez.
Salvador Sanchez fits more to the pure boxer type than Roy and Ali.
Seriously don't respond cuz you don't know what you're talking about.
Comment
-
Originally posted by M.I.C. View PostUnlike you, my definition of Pure boxing is not set in some cement classification, if you think about what you just wrote here then maybe finally you can understand why you are wrong. Again a pure boxer can do it all and transform if need be. Virtuoso is not a category in boxing, the guys I mentioned are trained in a pure boxing style and simply add their gifts to it. they are trained in the classic African American pure boxing style of fighting.
And also understand that my selected names are only the pure boxers who rise to the top of the sport, the biggest draws, the biggest names, etc...The whole point is how can you call this style of boxing boring or dull, when fighters trained in this style constantly become the top draw in the sport????
I do hope I have made my point clear for that last time.
why didnt you just said so i the first place???
Comment
-
Originally posted by M.I.C. View PostHow can you say Pac has the ability to beat a Pure Boxer when the closest he fought to 1 was Marquez, and when Morales opted to box rather than Brawl he beat Pac easily? And are you really going to compare Calzage beating a past prime RJ and BHop as evidence, he didn't meet many pure boxers in his career.
So now Pac doesnt have the ability to beat a pure boxer? LOL.
Vernon Forest (r.i.p) was a pure boxer and we all saw what Mayorga did to him 2x.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jrosales13 View PostBarrera was versatile and could do it all you racist prick. Just cuz he is Mexican don't mean he was not versatile.
Comment
-
Originally posted by fdotorres View Postyou're an imbecile then. jones jr is nowhere near being a pure boxer idiot
this era's best boxer isn't anywhere near a pure boxer either, so don't make **** up
Comment
-
Originally posted by M.I.C. View PostI have not studied Calderon do to a lack of exposure and perhaps fighting in such a light weight class is part of the problem. You do know I'm talking specifically about the biggest names in the sport, today and in its history, when you connect the dots they all connect to the best proponents of the African American Style of boxing.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Deevel916 View PostSo now Pac doesnt have the ability to beat a pure boxer? LOL.
Vernon Forest (r.i.p) was a pure boxer and we all saw what Mayorga did to him 2x.
Comment
Comment