Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pure Boxers Have Always Ruled Boxing

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Deevel916 View Post
    Tyson was as big as they come, and he was NOT a pure boxer!
    did you read the original post???? Apparently not.

    Comment


      Originally posted by M.I.C. View Post
      Your point is so wack, Barrera has shoddy defense, slow feet, come on dude dont make up some **** about Barrera to try to credit it to me.
      Barrera was versatile and could do it all you racist prick. Just cuz he is Mexican don't mean he was not versatile.

      Comment


        Originally posted by jrosales13 View Post
        You haven't studied Calderon?





        But, I thought you're the one who spills the truth and that I made a mistake in challenging you. And, you tell me that you really don't know who about Calderon? The best pure boxer in the last decade not named Mayweather and you have not studied him?

        And, then you here telling me that I only know about Pac. And, that you have so much more knowledge then I do. And, yet you can't tell me about one of the best pure boxers in the last decade?

        GTFOH... Sign off like you promised. Don't comeback. You know **** about boxing. About the history, about the styles you know ****.

        Just cuz Barrera is Mexican does not mean he is a come forward fighter. JMM does not have that style nor did Salvador Sancez.

        Salvador Sanchez fits more to the pure boxer type than Roy and Ali.

        Seriously don't respond cuz you don't know what you're talking about.
        I have not studied Calderon do to a lack of exposure and perhaps fighting in such a light weight class is part of the problem. You do know I'm talking specifically about the biggest names in the sport, today and in its history, when you connect the dots they all connect to the best proponents of the African American Style of boxing.

        Comment


          Originally posted by M.I.C. View Post
          Unlike you, my definition of Pure boxing is not set in some cement classification, if you think about what you just wrote here then maybe finally you can understand why you are wrong. Again a pure boxer can do it all and transform if need be. Virtuoso is not a category in boxing, the guys I mentioned are trained in a pure boxing style and simply add their gifts to it. they are trained in the classic African American pure boxing style of fighting.

          And also understand that my selected names are only the pure boxers who rise to the top of the sport, the biggest draws, the biggest names, etc...The whole point is how can you call this style of boxing boring or dull, when fighters trained in this style constantly become the top draw in the sport????

          I do hope I have made my point clear for that last time.
          so this is what this thread all boils down to, to insinuate that pure boxing is African american boxing.

          why didnt you just said so i the first place???

          Comment


            Originally posted by M.I.C. View Post
            How can you say Pac has the ability to beat a Pure Boxer when the closest he fought to 1 was Marquez, and when Morales opted to box rather than Brawl he beat Pac easily? And are you really going to compare Calzage beating a past prime RJ and BHop as evidence, he didn't meet many pure boxers in his career.

            So now Pac doesnt have the ability to beat a pure boxer? LOL.

            Vernon Forest (r.i.p) was a pure boxer and we all saw what Mayorga did to him 2x.

            Comment


              Originally posted by M.I.C. View Post
              Roy Jones was in my opinion, pure boxing can also be unorthodox
              you're an imbecile then. jones jr is nowhere near being a pure boxer idiot

              this era's best boxer isn't anywhere near a pure boxer either, so don't make **** up

              Comment


                Originally posted by jrosales13 View Post
                Barrera was versatile and could do it all you racist prick. Just cuz he is Mexican don't mean he was not versatile.
                Since when did I become anti MAB??? Sheesh, just to be honest with you if you want to know who my favorite fighter was growing up, Julio Cesar Chavez, who MAB reminded me a lot of at one point.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by fdotorres View Post
                  you're an imbecile then. jones jr is nowhere near being a pure boxer idiot

                  this era's best boxer isn't anywhere near a pure boxer either, so don't make **** up
                  Well why dont you tell me what Roy Jones is then, and then tell me about his training to. And then tell me exactly what style was that he was using in the Olympics?

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by M.I.C. View Post
                    I have not studied Calderon do to a lack of exposure and perhaps fighting in such a light weight class is part of the problem. You do know I'm talking specifically about the biggest names in the sport, today and in its history, when you connect the dots they all connect to the best proponents of the African American Style of boxing.
                    african american style? WOWWWW hahahahaha you're one ****ing dumb f@aggot styles don't have races moron

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Deevel916 View Post
                      So now Pac doesnt have the ability to beat a pure boxer? LOL.

                      Vernon Forest (r.i.p) was a pure boxer and we all saw what Mayorga did to him 2x.
                      when did I ever say a pure boxer cant be beat? And uh oh, did you just call Vernon a pure boxer, the definition police will surely be after you now.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP