Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

vitali vs maskev

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    i dont think vitali got surgery he been way to eager tryna find somebody to fight to **** up rahmans timing after his fight with barret..he tryna fit it in after barrett rahman with just enough time so that rahman wont have enuogh weeks to train

    Comment


      #32
      haha this thread is funny. McKay, Bozo is all over you like a cheap suit.

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by oldgringo
        haha this thread is funny. McKay, Bozo is all over you like a cheap suit.
        I dont even know what I am arguing about with him. I just think Rahman is really overrated basically. I think he will lose to Barrett, and therefore Maskaev is not really any worse than him. Bozo takes this **** in all kinds of different directions though and then he accuses me of changing the subject. All these guys basically are sub par in my opinion. I would like to see Krasniqui fight Vitali over these 3 guys, or over Valuev or Peter for that matter.

        Ideally I would want Klistchko to fight the other title holders though like everybody else.
        Last edited by The Troll; 06-17-2005, 03:52 PM.

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by McKay
          I dont even know what I am arguing about with him. I just think Rahman is really overrated basically. I think he will lose to Barrett, and therefore Maskaev is not really any worse than him. Bozo takes this **** in all kinds of different directions though and then he accuses me of changing the subject. All these guys basically are sub par in my opinion. I would like to see Krasniqui fight Vitali over these 3 guys, or over Valuev or Peter for that matter.

          Ideally I would want Klistchko to fight the other title holders though like everybody else.

          Wow is that ever comedy.

          You don't know what you're talking about, because everytime you are confronted with a point you don't like, you twist the subject.

          In case you forgot, you twisted and twisted until you were calling Friday Ahunanya a credible opponent.

          That was YOU doing the subject hoping. A trait you're fond of.

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by Bozo_no_no
            Wow is that ever comedy.

            You don't know what you're talking about, because everytime you are confronted with a point you don't like, you twist the subject.

            In case you forgot, you twisted and twisted until you were calling Friday Ahunanya a credible opponent.

            That was YOU doing the subject hoping. A trait you're fond of.
            What are you talking about. I was saying Krasniqui was a credible opponent partly because of his recent TKO victory of Whitaker. Then you said Whitaker was trash. But Whitaker recently beat Friday Anhunya who in his last fight had a draw with Dominic Guinn. You are really trying to misquote me is what you are doing.
            Last edited by The Troll; 06-17-2005, 03:58 PM.

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by McKay
              What are you talking about. I was saying Krasniqui was a credible opponent partly because of his recent TKO victory of Whitaker. Then you said Whitaker was trash. But Whitaker recently beat Friday Anhunya who in his last fight had a draw with Dominic Guinn. You are really trying to misquote me is what you are doing.

              With the amount of porrly thought posts it took you to say what you just said, there isn't really a good way to quote you effectivly. You're all over the place.

              In the end, it's back to Barrett and Rahman being more deserving than Krasniqui and Maskiev for a shot at Klitschko.

              Comment


                #37
                Originally posted by Bozo_no_no
                With the amount of porrly thought posts it took you to say what you just said, there isn't really a good way to quote you effectivly. You're all over the place.

                In the end, it's back to Barrett and Rahman being more deserving than Krasniqui and Maskiev for a shot at Klitschko.
                Rahman is more deserving than Krasniqui. For what? Beating Al Cole and Kali Meehan. A victory over Lance Mount Whitaker is better than either Cole or Meehan. But Rahman is not going to beat Barret anyway. And Whitaker who you say is such trash beat Barrett in 1999. And Maskaev who you say is such trash demolished Rahman in 1999. Like I said in my original premis. These guys are all pretty much on the same level....And that is the only point I wanted to ever make in this thread.


                This is my original post

                Originally posted by McKay
                What is he prooving by fighting Rahman/Barret Valuev or Peter. All these guys are on the same level in my opinion. Fighting Maskaev is a fight just as valid as any other when Vitali cant access King's Title Holders. BTW you ever see that brutal KO Maskaev layed on Rahman, one of the best KO's ever.
                Last edited by The Troll; 06-17-2005, 04:12 PM.

                Comment


                  #38
                  Originally posted by McKay
                  Rahman is more deserving than Krasniqui. For what? Beating Al Cole and Kali Meehan. A victory over Lance Mount Whitaker is better than either Cole or Meehan. But Rahman is not going to beat Barret anyway. And Whitaker who you say is such trash beat Barrett in 1999.
                  SIX years ago. What has he done since then? What has he done in the last 3 years? Nothing.

                  Rahman beat Lennox Lewis. That alone is better than anything Whittaker has ever done. Krasniqui's biggest win is over Whittaker.

                  I can't help you if you think he's a noteworthy win. That's ******.

                  Rahman and Barrett are easilly in the majority of top ten lists. Whittaker is not. Krasniqui shouldn't be yet either.

                  I understand what you're getting at, and I don't agree. You're entitled to your opinion, but it's a minority one at best.

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Originally posted by Bozo_no_no
                    SIX years ago. What has he done since then? What has he done in the last 3 years? Nothing.

                    Rahman beat Lennox Lewis. That alone is better than anything Whittaker has ever done. Krasniqui's biggest win is over Whittaker.

                    I can't help you if you think he's a noteworthy win. That's ******.

                    Rahman and Barrett are easilly in the majority of top ten lists. Whittaker is not. Krasniqui shouldn't be yet either.

                    I understand what you're getting at, and I don't agree. You're entitled to your opinion, but it's a minority one at best.
                    Still milking Rahman for that win against Lewis is very weak. Lewis has a weak chin and Rahman simply caught him. That is all Rahman is. A one punch wonder left over from the last decade. And you act like all these other guys I mentioned are on a level so below him, it is utterly ridiculous.

                    Comment


                      #40
                      Originally posted by Bozo_no_no
                      With the amount of porrly thought posts it took you to say what you just said, there isn't really a good way to quote you effectivly. You're all over the place.

                      In the end, it's back to Barrett and Rahman being more deserving than Krasniqui and Maskiev for a shot at Klitschko.

                      This mother****er doesn't care about wrong or right, or logic. He just wants to get under peoples' skin, and to feel like he controls others' emotions with his bull**** opinions that he tries to pass off as fact. He has always been, currently is, and always will be a **** riding ***** with no common sense and piss poor spelling skills who wants nothing more than to be able to tell himself that he "won" an argument, no matter how he has to twist, distort, or just plain lie about what others post. He secretly fancies himself as having the arguementative skills of a lawyer, but has the mental capacity of Ozzy Osbourne. See his opinion up there? See how he simply states it as a fact? Like it's up to him to decide lol. Look at every last one of his posts, and you'll see the same worthless **** lol

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP