Lets be honest. The difference between Europe and USA is...

[Stab Judah]

the fact that 1% of americans wanted germany to win the war

Idiots and psychos in every country.

[Left Banned Tua]

the fact that 1% of americans wanted germany to win the war

about 17% of americans now have german descent.

that percentage was higher in the 40's.

[SkillspayBills]

I can't lie, this thread has me CRYING from laughter. Those pics are funny as ****.

[Left Banned Tua]

"America went on to provide missiles, aircraft fuel, military equipment, and intelligence information to the British government. On May 3 he even proposed sending down the carrier USS Eisenhower to act as a mobile runway for British planes in the South Atlantic, an offer which, as Mrs Thatcher recorded in her memoirs, “we found more encouraging than practical”. "

. telegraph .co. uk/news/obituaries/7499144/Caspar-Weinberger.html

Did the UK need the US's to take back the Falklands? Probably not. Did I say the UK needed the US to take back the Falklands? No (don't put words in my mouth).

Besides it was Margaret Thatcher herself that said (AND I QUOTE) without the Sidewinder "supplied to us by US Defence Minister Caspar Weinberger, we could never have got back the Falklands." (by the way did you read that part on my last post? probably not).

thatcher and reagan were very close.

that's just political talk. there was a lot of criticism of the united states in britain at the time because of their lack of assistance during the war.

america did not want to get involved. they did not want to appear to take sides between american south american allies and their british allies.

those weapons were never used in the falklands. what the british used in the falklands was weapons they already had.

look up the date when those weapons were delivered and the date when the royal navy fleet set sail for the south atlantic.

don't try to argue on this matter. you have no basis for your argument.

britain went on pretty much on its own with minimal aid from the u.s.

[WarriorSoul]

thatcher and reagan were very close.

that's just political talk. there was a lot of criticism of the united states in britain at the time because of their lack of assistance during the war.

america did not want to get involved. they did not want to appear to take sides between american south american allies and their british allies.

those weapons were never used in the falklands. what the british used in the falklands was weapons they already had.

look up the date when those weapons were delivered and the date when the royal navy fleet set sail for the south atlantic.

don't try to argue on this matter. you have no basis for your argument.

britain went on pretty much on its own with minimal aid from the u.s.

LOL I'm done. I guess Margaret Thatcher was ****in dead-wrong then right?? I'm not even arguing, I'm just stating facts. Deal with them.

[SkillspayBills]

Typical America idiot's............

LMAORTF!! Do they still have their online show? I used to love watching their idiocy.

[Left Banned Tua]

LOL I'm done. I guess Margaret Thatcher was ****in dead-wrong then right?? I'm not even arguing, I'm just stating facts. Deal with them.

you're not dealing with facts.

the americans main goal throughout the conflict was to stop the conflict.

america considered both countries as allies. britain is the more traditional and more important ally but the u.s. is not just taking the argentines in consideration but the whole of south america.

america didn't give britain support (verbally) until after britain was able to get support from the europeans and the UN. even then it was lukewarm support. america wouldn't have even given britain that much support if it wasn't for the fact that argentine couldn't even get support from the OAS.


you don't know what you're talking about.

don't talk when you don't know much about a subject.

[SkillspayBills]

Damnit you guys are never going to let that go. That will always be the ***** card in labeling us as dumbasses.

[project xxx1]

you're not dealing with facts.

the americans main goal throughout the conflict was to stop the conflict.

america considered both countries as allies. britain is the more traditional and more important ally but the u.s. is not just taking the argentines in consideration but the whole of south america.

america didn't give britain support (verbally) until after britain was able to get support from the europeans and the UN. even then it was lukewarm support. america wouldn't have even given britain that much support if it wasn't for the fact that argentine couldn't even get support from the OAS.


you don't know what you're talking about.

don't talk when you don't know much about a subject.

damm man you still ***ing up people in your threads???lol forget debating with you if you dont know your stuff 100 percent

[Naps]