Wlad's left hook did NOT land!!!!

[BritishBoxing92]

I've seen the replay from different angles now dozens of times and Wlad's left hook does NOT land. I am not some kind of hater and I don't have an agenda. That punch did not land. When Wlad is throwing the punch, Eddie's guard comes up while he is simultaneously moving back and his head is going back and to the left a bit. The punch never landed folks. The punch hit the inside of Eddie's left glove and Eddie's glove richocheted into his face which caused his head to snap back and that made it look like it was a clean punch. Watch the replays from the different angles as many times as it takes to see what really happened.

i dont care what you say lol it still managed to KO eddie and it was still a Beautiful Left Hook and it was a good fight..

[5burowz]

No, in the vid I posted at 4:32 in slow motion you can see that Chambers glove is clearly behind the temple at the point of impact.

And if you look even more closely, you can see that Eddie's entire head is well behind Wlad's fist and it matters not the proximity of Eddie's right hand. I think you really need to watch it from all three angles at least 10 times each and then you'll start to see what I see.

[Shazam!]

there is one angle from above where the punch clearly lands and Chambers' head snaps to one side. He was already spent and that caught him right on the temple. Just cus it wasn't a spectacular KO doesn't mean he didn't hurt him.

[5burowz]

Man has never been on the moon.

911 was staged by the US government.

The pope is really a protestant.

Wlads punch didn't land.

My argument is quite clear and concise and there is no conspiracy theory. Perhaps you should take the time to watch it multiple times from the three angles or maybe you just need glasses. I'm not asking you to believe me, I'm asking you to objectively look at the slo-mo footage multiple times from the three camera angles.

[THe TRiNiTY]

Before making a claim like this, ask yourself some questions.

1. Why would Eddie Chambers take a dive in the last round, 30 seconds away from escaping with a horrible decision, but a decision nonetheless?

2. Why would he not try to stop his fall in any way? Not even try. He almost fell out of the ring, if not for the bottom rope. Why would he risk that. Because if he slipped and went to the floor, and he was awake, he'd have either been dumb enough to allow the brain damage that the floor would cause, or he'd have to catch himself.

3. he was getting tagged by shots in the last few rounds. Moreso than in the earlier rounds, for sure. Why would he take a dive on the punch that DOESN'T land?

4. If they wanted him to take a dive, why would they make him take it after a fight that lacked some action? In a fight that took forever to get to a conclusion in some fans minds. Doesn't make sense.

Finally, the point to this all is that you're essentially making a claim that Chambers took a dive. Either because they wanted him to, or he wanted a way out. He was 30 or so seconds away from a way out. That is pretty unlikely. Klitschko's camp would have probably have wanted it to happen before that. Realistically. I doubt they wanted it to go like, "Yeah, make the fight long, tur some blood-thirsty fans off, and we'll end it about 30 seconds before the bell rings in a fight that was already decided."

If HE decided to take the dive, then it says a lot about Klitschko. It means that Chambers didn't even want to get hit for 30 more seconds, so the power was getting to him one way or another.

Regardless, he DID get hit and he DID get knocked out. Case closed.

[BattlingNelson]

My argument is quite clear and concise and there is no conspiracy theory. Perhaps you should take the time to watch it multiple times from the three angles or maybe you just need glasses. I'm not asking you to believe me, I'm asking you to objectively look at the slo-mo footage multiple times from the three camera angles.

So you're implying that Chambers took a dive??

[5burowz]

You are pointing to the same far away angle that caused su****ion in the 1st place....

The close up slow motion view where the shot clearly lands at 4:32 is good enough for me.

Too difficult to put all of the frames together, eh? Is it really that difficult? Hopefully, we'll get an overhead angle of the punch which should definitively corroborate what I am saying. But, believe what you want. I know for a fact that the punch did not land. I am not blind, stubborn, or a Wlad hater. All I did was take the time to really analyze it and I'm just reporting my findings.

[BritishBoxing92]

So you're implying that Chambers took a dive??

they would believe anything BattlingNelson...me on the other hand i enjoyed the fight all the way through and also i enjoyed the KO punch and plus i won 25K off Dorian on a bet we made

[Mersey]

Actually, he didn't land face first, but that's beside the point and not even relevant.

What would you say then? When somebody is not laying on their back, but actually face down?

I'm sure most people would say he landed face first. Not literally face first, but it's what people say.

And it is very relevant, because it's almost impossible to do when you're fully conscious.

[5burowz]

there is one angle from above where the punch clearly lands and Chambers' head snaps to one side. He was already spent and that caught him right on the temple. Just cus it wasn't a spectacular KO doesn't mean he didn't hurt him.

Show it to me. If that's the case then I'll retract my statements. I want to see better footage of it CLEARLY landing on his face because what is presented in these YouTube videos does NOT show it landing on his head/face.