For 40 fights, its quite clear this guy used PEDs

[carts]

Can you even read?
I specifically state in my post this is using the flawed logic of this thread.
And in the section you quote i specifically state ;

(or we could be rational and realise noone declines to take the USADA if neither fighter, promotion or comission suggests it)

Maybe you should ask Micky to cut you. Your eyes is swollen shut.

this thread is about the past idiot!! cant u read???

this...
(or we could be rational and realise noone declines to take the USADA if neither fighter, promotion or comission suggests it)
did floyd asked for it in the past??? NO!! so what the fack is ur point???

[fugu]

this thread is about the past idiot!! cant u read???

this...
(or we could be rational and realise noone declines to take the USADA if neither fighter, promotion or comission suggests it)
did floyd asked for it in the past??? NO!! so what the fack is ur point???

This thread is filled to the rafters with faulty logic.

No Floyd did not ask for it in the past. Why would he have done that?
If you are innocent you wont go to the police and say "please take me in for a hearing of X-crime".
If however you saw your neighbor do it you might call the police and ask them to question him.

carts did you travel to haiti to help the victims of the natural disaster? Could we say that you declined to help them out?
No we couldnt.
If however someone asked you to go and you said no, you would have declined.

Next.

[bdevils]

sup ****, do you have any explanation why Froid Jr, did not submit himself to OST?

Do you think he was jucin'?

sup ****, do you have any explanation why Froid Jr, did not submit himself to OST?

Do you think he was jucin'?

[fugu]

Also. In the case that you want to find someone guilty, you have to prove that they commited the act of crime. It is not up to the defendant to prove anything.


Can anyone prove that Floyd used PEDS in his previous fights?

Otherwise you have no case.

All we know for certain is that Pacquiao is the only one in the history refusing to take USADA proper testing procedure. That is fact.
Rest is speculations.

de·cline (d-kln)
v. de·clined, de·clin·ing, de·clines
v.intr.
1. To express polite refusal.

[carts]

This thread is filled to the rafters with faulty logic.

No Floyd did not ask for it in the past. Why would he have done that?
If you are innocent you wont go to the police and say "please take me in for a hearing of X-crime".
If however you saw your neighbor do it you might call the police and ask them to question him.

carts did you travel to haiti to help the victims of the natural disaster? Could we say that you declined to help them out?
No we couldnt.
If however someone asked you to go and you said no, you would have declined.

Next.

the point of this thread is simple.. very simple.. you can never tell floyd is clean or dirty right??? no proof he didnt used peds in the past right??? so read again...
For 40 fights, its quite clear this guy used PEDs

so do you have any proof he didnt used PEDS??? it is that simple.. not easy to understand.. even mickey can clearly understand it...

[carts]

Also. In the case that you want to find someone guilty, you have to prove that they commited the act of crime. It is not up to the defendant to prove anything.


Can anyone prove that Floyd used PEDS in his previous fights?

Otherwise you have no case.

All we know for certain is that Pacquiao is the only one in the history refusing to take USADA proper testing procedure. That is fact.
Rest is speculations.

de·cline (d-kln)
v. de·clined, de·clin·ing, de·clines
v.intr.
1. To express polite refusal.

so you can get off this thread and answer to PACs Roids issues.. this thread isnt about PAC..

[fugu]

so you can get off this thread and answer to PACs Roids issues.. this thread isnt about PAC..

Can you prove Floyd used PEDS?

You have to prove that HE is guilty. Not the other way around.

So show some proof. Until then it is to be considered that Floyd is innocent.

You have the burden of proof. Present them

[Carpe Diem]

86 pages of what? I hate *******s!

[carts]

Can you prove Floyd used PEDS?

You have to prove that HE is guilty. Not the other way around.

So show some proof. Until then it is to be considered that Floyd is innocent.

You have the burden of proof. Present them

so u answered me with a question.. as i said its either he is dirty or not..

[fugu]

so u answered me with a question.. as i said its either he is dirty or not..

If you can not prove he is guilty, he is innocent.

Innocent until proven guilty. Is it that hard to grasp?
Are you admitting you have no proof for Floyd being guilty? That would end the thread right here.