anyway, unless somebody beats him, pac will remain p4p king...

[SteveJarvey]

doesnt matter what the freaks here says.

[#1Assassin]

p4p is an opinion.

floyd and pac both had times were they couldnt be questioned as p4p kings, but thats no longer the case. whoever wins between floyd and shane will have a very solid argument for p4p king.

some will stay with pac and some will switch their list up, id say no matter who u pick u cant say its by a landslide.

[Reloaded]

Floyd will give him a boxing lesson thats why Pac ducked him and the test .

[Bring It On]

Floyd will give him a boxing lesson thats why Pac ducked him and the test .

Manny would have punished him, and like Floyd says: "There's nothing cool about getting beat up, and taking punishment." That's why HE ducked Pac.

[$partacus]

You don't have to lose to be replaced.

[Bring It On]

p4p is an opinion.

Well, every ranking is.

[#1Assassin]

Well, every ranking is.

yeah but p4p is over all divisions. if someone is champ in a weightclass he needs to lose, move up or retire to lose the lineal title. nobody takes alphabet straps to serious when it comes to being #1 in a ceratain division. my point is its settled in the ring. u want a mans title take it.

p4p u can be at 135, and the p4p king is at 175. so saying a guy has to lose to lose his p4p title is just ignorant. now we are blessed enough for the top guys to be in the same division, but bcuz of the history of the p4p title they still dont have to meet, nor does pac has to lose for him to lose the p4p title.

i meant on p4p lists u just compare guys, in weightclasses they get it on. or they are supposed to anyways..

[SteveJarvey]

You don't have to lose to be replaced.

Not in PAC's case

[Boxin']

Not in PAC's case

what if Pac retires for 2 years and then comes back?

[SteveJarvey]

what if Pac retires for 2 years and then comes back?

That's "what if".