well that can be debated but that is where most sites have him rated. Most have him at 4 or 5 but I did see some place have him at 3. Wins over a prime, probably roided up Margarito, Winky, and Sergio are all very solid wins so I have no objection to it. Where would you rank him? Becareful with what you say because Burner is always lurking, lol
Right now, I dont have him rank in My list, but 7-10 is about fair, top 5 no. Top 3? **** no.
I wouldn't mind seeing Paul smash Quintana again. Just to stop hearimg about the first fight. And I still don't think Williams has to prove that he's a better fighter than Qunitana. He proved that beyond a doubt in the rematch.
I'm not big on Williams (maybe someday I will be), but the bold is clear as day.
The only reason I have been against a rematch is that Quintana has done **** since getting erased by Williams beating Berto would be something so to me the rubber match is more appealing.
Williams needs to take the fight to Quintana if they fight again, he needs to be smart with his pressure but to me he should be able to make Quintana crack. If William's does not pressure smartly Quintana could outbox him again or if Williams is trying hard for the knock out.
Well see, I dont think Williams did prove he was better in the rematch. I think its obvious to most that Williams is better than Quintana but does that mean he's a better fighter head to head? It doesnt mean that to me. If you ask me, Quintana's win was more legit than Williams. Anyone can catch someone with a shot but he beat Williams convincgly over 12 rounds. There aint nothing flukey about that. We couldnt even argue that Williams had won. Williams didnt even argue.
I also still saw Williams have mad mad mad trouble against the Southpaw in Sergio who is probably better than Quintana but I still think Williams could have mad trouble with slick Southpaws so it wouldnt shock me at all to see Quintana roll his ass and it wouldnt shock me that if they fought 100 times that Quintana wins more than Williams. However, Quintana wouldnt beat Margarito, Winky and so on, so you would have to say that Williams is clearly better in that regard but head to head can be argued
Well see, I dont think Williams did prove he was better in the rematch. I think its obvious to most that Williams is better than Quintana but does that mean he's a better fighter head to head? It doesnt mean that to me. If you ask me, Quintana's win was more legit than Williams. Anyone can catch someone with a shot but he beat Williams convincgly over 12 rounds. There aint nothing flukey about that. We couldnt even argue that Williams had won. Williams didnt even argue.
I also still saw Williams have mad mad mad trouble against the Southpaw in Sergio who is probably better than Quintana but I still think Williams could have mad trouble with slick Southpaws so it wouldnt shock me at all to see Quintana roll his ass and it wouldnt shock me that if they fought 100 times that Quintana wins more than Williams. However, Quintana wouldnt beat Margarito, Winky and so on, so you would have to say that Williams is clearly better in that regard but head to head can be argued
Williams didnt KO him with one punch. It was a sound gameplan. Williams didnt do to much coming forward until he hurt him. He played counter puncher and it threw Quintana off. He countered him perfectly and Q had no answers. That was a GREAT strategy and that was on purpose. Ofcourse they aint no he was gon be KO'd so quick but Paul worked his ass off that re-match and he handled his business.
Watch this video:
This wasnt the Paul we were used to seeing. He wasnt going crazy in there. He played counter puncher and he was timing Quintana. It wasnt fluke that was the gameplan.
Comment