Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Who is the better fighter, who has the better legacy...Tito or Oscar?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    I think Oscar de la Hoya did betta things than Trinidad. Oscar is mo popular and jest look at them now. Trinidad was one sidedly beaten by Winky and Trinidad goes back to retirment home. Oscar will probably fight Judah and has a chance to become champ again.

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by Manny_P
      I think Oscar de la Hoya did betta things than Trinidad. Oscar is mo popular and jest look at them now. Trinidad was one sidedly beaten by Winky and Trinidad goes back to retirment home. Oscar will probably fight Judah and has a chance to become champ again.
      Honestly, Tito fought two guys too big and good as opposed to just "too good". He's aging and only a fool can bag on him too much for either loss. He pushed the limits and found out where his boundaries are.

      My question is why must a fighter keep on campaigning til he gets beat the **** up in the ring? I'm just guessing but he may need to retire; why can't his loved ones and advisors convince him of same?

      ****, I've always respected him and admired him if not all his fans.

      Comment


        #23
        Oscar Dela Hoya all the way!!!

        Comment


          #24
          first of all, Oscar has an Olympic gold medal in his name. he fought and won professional titles in 6 different weight classes. he is incomparable to tito

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by Shaolin Bushido
            Honestly, Tito fought two guys too big and good as opposed to just "too good". He's aging and only a fool can bag on him too much for either loss. He pushed the limits and found out where his boundaries are.

            My question is why must a fighter keep on campaigning til he gets beat the **** up in the ring? I'm just guessing but he may need to retire; why can't his loved ones and advisors convince him of same?

            ****, I've always respected him and admired him if not all his fans.
            yea I agree. Now that we are on this matta, I guess Lennox Lewis must be a Harvard graduate! bwahahahehehehe!

            Comment


              #26
              Its DLH by far.


              Dont pay IwatchBoxing any attention. He just losses all sense of reality when it comes to Puerto Rican fighters.

              against the 3 best fighters Tito fougfht not only did he lose he's wasn't even competative. What did he do after his first "official loss"? did he come back harder and stronger than ever?...Nope he retired and quit, What did he do after the Winky fight? Did he pursure a rematch?...Nope he retired and quit.

              Comment


                #27
                They are just two of the best fighters of our era...

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by IwatchBoxing
                  Whitaker wasnt old, and Camacho lost like a year before to Chavez when Trinidad fought him, and Chavez was 97-1-1, so unless he was fighting milkmen there shouldnt of been a problem.
                  whitiker was 35 at the time he fought trinidad so yeah id say he was old. it was also whitikers second to last fight before he retired, there is no way tito lays a glove on a prime sweet pea. whitikers defense was excelent and top 10 all time, if you think he had trouble with wrights defense i can only imagine the fits pernell would have given tito. whitiker is an all time great fighter and far better than tito. whitker is def top 20, tito aint top 50

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by jose
                    Its DLH by far.


                    Dont pay IwatchBoxing any attention. He just losses all sense of reality when it comes to Puerto Rican fighters.

                    against the 3 best fighters Tito fougfht not only did he lose he's wasn't even competative. What did he do after his first "official loss"? did he come back harder and stronger than ever?...Nope he retired and quit, What did he do after the Winky fight? Did he pursure a rematch?...Nope he retired and quit.
                    Jose I respect you a lot, but when it comes to Oscar you are also a bit biased...Oscar lost to Nard, Mosley, Sturm, and yes he was winning the fight against Tito but he RUN like a coward in the last 4 rounds...

                    Tito lost to two of the best tactical fighter on the sport, one unbeaten for a whole decade and another for the past 5 year, the same guy that beat Mosley twice..

                    I wouldn't rate one above the other, In my book the best 3 fighters of my era are Trinidad, De La Hoya, and Roy Jones..

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by The Fix
                      whitiker was 35 at the time he fought trinidad so yeah id say he was old. it was also whitikers second to last fight before he retired, there is no way tito lays a glove on a prime sweet pea. whitikers defense was excelent and top 10 all time, if you think he had trouble with wrights defense i can only imagine the fits pernell would have given tito. whitiker is an all time great fighter and far better than tito. whitker is def top 20, tito aint top 50
                      Well stop imagining, Trinidad would do better than Chavez, too big, and he could box at Welterweight too, he would of still won, and De La Hoya stood well with him in his prime, he is not as invinceable as you think.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP