Floyd Mayweather Jr.'s stats. His accuracy + defense is outrageous.

[PAC-BOY]

Huh? The TS didn't mention Pacquiao once, all he did was make a thread with some stats to show some appreciation to a fighter and to give him some credit for the skills he has... but then you just posted loads of Pacquiao facts when you was unprovoked, why is that?

because i felt like it! Are you upset about this?

[The Gambler1981]

Floyd 115-111 Baaaaaw!! LOL

Your scored is biased towards Floyd because your a Floyd ball hugger thats why you keep telling me to shut up about it because you cant handle that deep down you know he really lost the fight.


That scorecard was ridiculous for a man who says it was a close fight LOL

I said the fight can be scored in a range I could easily score teh 5th for JLC making it 114-112 and said I could understand a range of scores because of the close rounds. Floyd won the fight and you seem to be able to not understand how to score a fight or understand that the rounds you scored close for JLC could have easily went to Floyd.

A key question when claiming robbery is knowing what rounds are close and could go either way, you seem to not get that. Which is why you are a joke.

[The Gambler1981]

You should stop embarrassing yourself with your ridiculous scorecard LOL

Only a ****** would of scored that fight 115-111 and then say but it was a close fight, favouring your boy much?

The end scorecard is just how the rounds got scored it does not take into account close rounds. You can lose 8 rounds but lose 4 real close and it is still a close fight because the fight could get scored several different ways.

[check hook]

I said the fight can be scored in a range I could easily score teh 5th for JLC making it 114-112 and said I could understand a range of scores because of the close rounds. Floyd won the fight and you seem to be able to not understand how to score a fight or understand that the rounds you scored close for JLC could have easily went to Floyd.

A key question when claiming robbery is knowing what rounds are close and could go either way, you seem to not get that. Which is why you are a joke.

The issue wasn't Floyd wining or JLC winning........it could have been scored for either fighter........

The issue was the scorecards........there is no way either fighter won by those margins

[Dynamite Kid]

I said the fight can be scored in a range I could easily score teh 5th for JLC making it 114-112 and said I could understand a range of scores because of the close rounds. Floyd won the fight and you seem to be able to not understand how to score a fight or understand that the rounds you scored close for JLC could have easily went to Floyd.

A key question when claiming robbery is knowing what rounds are close and could go either way, you seem to not get that. Which is why you are a joke.

But your score was ultimately 115-111 so stop back tracking you little slaag!

Mayweather could of won some of swing rounds and i have not denied that but how many swing rounds do you wanna give him before your giving him the benefit of the doubt too much and and not giving Castillo enough of the benefit of the doubt?

Fact is Mayweather/Castillo was a close fight in terms of there was a quite a few swing rounds but in most!! peoples estimations if anyone should of been leaned toward as the winner it was Castillo,now a draw is not a terrible decision but to have Mayweather actually winning the fight makes it a robbery, oh and to have a card of 115 to Mayweather shows how biased your scoring really was because you would have to of hardly given Castillo the benefit of the doubt in hardly any of the swing rounds, in short you dont know how to score a fight or you just dont know how to score without biased

Mayweather got a draw at BEST!

[The Gambler1981]

Thats ok dont get too uptight about it. Your idol Floyd lost but got the decision so be happy for floyd. It is Castillo who has to be unhappy because its a loss instead of a win on his resume

It was a close fight and JLC lost, he fought well and came on strong but he still lost more rounds in the eyes of the judges and in the eyes of most of the ringside press. The only issue the fight gets called a robbery is the scores which is how I scored it to prove a point.

It was a close fight the judges liked waht Floyd did, and given the subjective nature of judging close fight where rounds could go either way can not be robberies.

Overdramatic chicken littles call every close fight a robbery and this is one of those fights~

[The Gambler1981]

But your score was ultimately 115-111 so stop back tracking you little slaag!

Mayweather could of won some of swing rounds and i have not denied that but how many swing rounds do you wanna give him before your giving him the benefit of the doubt too much and and not giving Castillo enough of the benefit of the doubt?

Fact is Mayweather/Castillo was a close fight in terms of there was a quite a few swing rounds but in most!! peoples estimations if anyone should of been leaned toward as the winner it was Castillo,now a draw is not a terrible decision but to have Mayweather actually winning the fight makes it a robbery, oh and to have a card of 115 to Mayweather shows how biased your scoring really was because you would have to of hardly given Castillo the benefit of the doubt in hardly any of the swing rounds, in short you dont know how to score a fight or you just dont know how to score without biased

Mayweather got a draw at BEST!

You are the one that called it a robbery not me, I called it a close fight 8-4 is not a wide decision it can be clear or it can be a close fight where one guy happeaned to win 8 rounds.

If you want to see bias you should look in the mirror~

[Dynamite Kid]

You are the one that called it a robbery not me, I called it a close fight 8-4 is not a wide decision it can be clear or it can be a close fight where one guy happeaned to win 8 rounds.

If you want to see bias you should look in the mirror~

Biased is a guy that see's the fight 115 to Mayweather because that dictates your giving most of swing rounds to Mayweather and hardly any to Castillo.

I think we both know who is the biased little turd here, you!

Your either incompetent or biased to ****.

[hugh grant]

Biased is a guy that see's the fight 115 to Mayweather because that dictates your giving most of swing rounds to Mayweather and hardly any to Castillo.

I think we both know who is the biased little turd here, you!

Your either incompetent or biased to ****.

I agree. Sometimes its impossible to make people see sense.
There were some pretty close rounds. But judges used to give it for aggression and for the person trying to make the fight. Which was Castillo.

[The Gambler1981]

Biased is a guy that see's the fight 115 to Mayweather because that dictates your giving most of swing rounds to Mayweather and hardly any to Castillo.

I think we both know who is the biased little turd here, you!

Your either incompetent or biased to ****.

You should follow your own advice once again.

I am sorry that you can not handle my opinion and have to resort to name calling, if you want to score teh fight for JLC fine I don't care whatever but it was by no means a robbery because the fight could end up going either way depending on several crucial rounds.

115-111 is how the judges scored the fight which is why I scored it that way, the judges score cards are why the press had issues with the fight they had no issue with Floyd winning. Sorry that you can not come to grips with it.

If you want to call robbery you better point me 9 clear rounds that JLC won and no way could be scored differently.

It is obvious who is the insecure one is~