That just sounds funny " Floyd coming for all TOP Welters " like he's currently wiping out the division when he hasn't even started with one.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Mayweather's Adviser: Floyd Coming For All Top Welters
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Calilloyd View PostBased on what? His losses?
Bradley doesn't have a big name on his resume yet.. Clottey is damn near a middlweight with power, a tough style and very good defense.
He's shown he's a worthy opponent and a tough challenge in the Margarito and Cotto fights. He lost one do to a hand injury and the other by split decision.
I don't see anything that Bradley has done yet that would warrant such a shot anyway.. really he hasn't done much yet. That's not to say that he wont do great things.. I think he is a great fighter and good talent but no way is he a tougher opponent then Clottey.
Comment
-
Originally posted by solly6 View PostHe's looking to fight JW's now, that is the proof dumbass. He was too small against cotto and clottey.Last edited by Calilloyd; 01-30-2010, 05:58 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by AllEyesOpen View PostDamn, Manny might be left out in the cold for at least 2 fight. At least Mayweather went after the best ww, and Mosley had the balls to undergo random blood tests. Should be a great fight.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sin City View Postlol you are one of those delusional little fan boys that think an undefeated record means everything.. if that were the case then Marciano would be greater than Ali.
Before you go any further with your childish responses. I can just as easily call you a "fan boy" trying to make Clottey into something he is not because he's fighting Pacquaio. My point was that Bradley has proven he can gut it out and turn it on when he needs to. Cloittey has never done that. He basically gave away the Cotto fight by not fighting because he wanted to play it safe. So what does that tell you? A fighter can't continue to thrive from losses. At some point he needs to win.
Bradley doesn't have a big name on his resume yet.. Clottey is damn near a middlweight with power, a tough style and very good defense.
He's shown he's a worthy opponent and a tough challenge in the Margarito and Cotto fights. He lost one do to a hand injury and the other by split decision.
Who the hell has Clottey ever knocked out to show that he's "damn near a middlweight with power? And if he was "damn near a middlweight" he would not have rejected a fight with Paul Williams because he didn't want to move up to 154. Clottey is not a Middlweight. Compare him to real Middlweights like Kelly Pavlik, Aurther Abraham and Jermaine Taylor at 160 and tell me if their sizes are comparable.
I don't see anything that Bradley has done yet that would warrant such a shot anyway.. really he hasn't done much yet. That's not to say that he wont do great things.. I think he is a great fighter and good talent but no way is he a tougher opponent then Clottey.
Hasn't done much yet? Please. Bradley has beaten Kendall Holt, Junior Witter, and dominated Lamont Peterson and Nate Campbell. Those are all top fighters and three are former world champions. When you can find those achievements on Clotteys resume let me know. And I never said Bradley deserved a shot. But in my mind he is a better and tougher opponent than Clottey and I already explained why.Last edited by Calilloyd; 01-30-2010, 06:23 PM.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Calilloyd View PostHe was a welterweight champion moron. You said he was too small for the division which is not surprising considering how many other ignorant, fictional post you put on here. And he didn't lose to Clottey and Cotto because he was "too small" idiot. If so how do you explain his KO of Corey Spinks and all of his other wins? And he also lost to Mayweather who is the same size and Cotto also came up from 140,unless you forgot. Log off and come back when you complete your hooked on phonics.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Calilloyd View PostHe was a welterweight champion moron. You said he was too small for the division which is not surprising considering how many other ignorant, fictional post you put on here. And he didn't lose to Clottey and Cotto because he was "too small" idiot. If so how do you explain his KO of Corey Spinks and all of his other wins? And he also lost to Mayweather who is the same size and Cotto also came up from 140,unless you forgot. Log off and come back when you complete your hooked on phonics.
Comment
Comment