i'm just sayin'...was it ever stated that the fight would be off if he did come up dirty? maybe he would have just been fined...
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
how do you know that floyd wouldn't have fought pac if he came up dirty?
Collapse
-
Cus there would be media pandemonium everywhere, focusing on Pacquiao being dirty. That would take focus away from Floyd. Plus, Jr. would have a legitimate reason for not fighting Paco.
Comment
-
Originally posted by screwhead1 View Posti'm just sayin'...was it ever stated that the fight would be off if he did come up dirty? maybe he would have just been fined...
PS the chick in ya sigLast edited by odogg8121; 01-21-2010, 09:30 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Squabbles94806 View PostCus there would be media pandemonium everywhere, focusing on Pacquiao being dirty. That would take focus away from Floyd. Plus, Jr. would have a legitimate reason for not fighting Paco.
talk about "legacy don't pay bills"
Comment
-
Wow I just said this in another thread. Yes I think Floyd would have stil fought Pac. I think he just wanted everyone to know the circumstances.
The real question is (and that is if pac is on something) is that would he have been willing to take it for this fight and risk getting caught. Does he think he has a chance without it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ray` View PostHe would have fought him but expose him later especially if Mayweather lost the fight !!!
Comment
-
Originally posted by royin View PostBoxing commissions won't allow the fight to take place for it is against the rules. I think urine testing is enough to detect PEDs so Floyd should not be worried.
floydie really just wants to protect the legacy...
WOOO FOR LEGACY DON'T PAY BILLS!!!
Comment
Comment