Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Unbiased Mom On Pacquiao: "Guilty As Hell"

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
    #1

    Unbiased Mom On Pacquiao: "Guilty As Hell"

    EDIT: ***Let me clarify one thing. Seems that Jack D Ripper just couldn't hold back his idiotic impulses. My mom doesn't know a DAMN thing about boxing or Mayweather and Pacquio even are. So if that isn't unbiased enough for you, then I don't know what to tell you**

    I know I'm about to catch a lot of heat from the Pac Stans/ Floyd haters, but I wanted to get an unbiased opinion on this whole situation, and there was no better person to ask than my mother. So I called her up and broke down the whole situation to her. So here is what I broke down for her:

    1. Mayweather/Pacquiao - biggest fight out there; both stand to make about 40 million dollars that night.

    2. Mayweather camp is su****ious of Pacquiao's rise in weight classes and domination of bigger fighters.

    3. Mayweather requested that they both undergo Olympic style blood testing that is NOT required by the commission.

    4. Pacquiao's camp has been making a big fuss about the whole drug testing issue.

    5. Pacquiao's camp has been making contradictory statements, such as "we'll take any test in the world" "5 day window is good" "pacquiao is superstitious" etc, etc, etc..

    6. Ariza claimed that Pacquiao doesn't know what he's taking.

    7. Pacquiao was willing to take a test after the press conference, 30 days before the fight, and after the fight.

    8. Pacquiao's final offer was a 24 day window.

    9. Pacquiao appears to have officially rejected Mayweather's 14 day window offer and accepted another fight, thus throwing away 40 million dollars.

    After explaining all of that to her, I asked her how she thought that made Pacquiao look. Her response was "guilty as hell!" She went on to explain how anyone with nothing to hide would stick out their arm and say "here, take the blood".

    Anyway, the point of this thread was not to say, "see, Pacquiao is guilty because my mom said so". I just want to know how many of you have asked completely unbiased people about their take on this whole situation. I believe Teddy Atlas is right and that your average person who has no emotional attachment to either fighter is going to be really su****ious of Pacquiao.

    So, have any of you asked non-fans what they thought about the whole situation? If so, what were their responses?

    Oh, and don't waste your time with the mom insults or "you're a newbie" nonsense. Either share your experiences or don't bother replying.
    Last edited by JKaL; 01-09-2010, 01:20 PM. Reason: clarification
    #2
    Its a good post and quite frankly its the view any person with common sense would have. After putting all difference aside and looking at the whole picture, its obvious as night and day.

    Comment

      #3
      Everyone that I have asked has said that manny has to be on something. It's obvious.40 million on the table but you turn it down because of a test?

      Comment

        #4
        As wacky as it sounds -- It didn't matter who thought what -- Arum was never going to put Manny in there with Floyd to begin with.

        He's not that dumb.

        Comment

          #5
          There's no such thing as objectivity. Everyone has built in intrinsic biases.

          Just cuz' she popped a kid out of her "vag" doesn't make her any less biased than anyone else.

          Comment

            #6
            They dont fight, no problem. Pac is i HIGH ATG and PBF isnt. Not taking the PBF fight dont change that.

            No boxing historian who puts manny no3 ATG boxer will say, "well Pac could have been No2 instead of no3 on my list if he had only taken the tests against PBF"

            Comment

              #7
              Originally posted by hugh grant View Post
              They dont fight, no problem. Pac is i HIGH ATG and PBF isnt. Not taking the PBF fight dont change that.
              Thats not the point *******. The point is, Pacman is looking suspect anyway you look at it.

              Comment

                #8
                Originally posted by Jack D Ripper View Post
                There's no such thing as objectivity. Everyone has built in intrinsic biases.

                Just cuz' she popped a kid out of her "vag" doesn't make her any less biased than anyone else.
                Seriously? That's the best you could come up with? Oh I get it, my mom doesn't know who Mayweather or Pacquiao is, but she's biased towards Floyd? Man, take your ass somewhere. I'm done with you. Don't even say anything back to me.

                Comment

                  #9
                  You forgot to add that Mayweather has been criticized in recent fights for choosing fighters with no real chance of winning and that he had never asked for these tests before. C'mon you cant explain it to her in a biased way and expect her answer to be unbiased. You kids crack me up, both sides.

                  Comment

                    #10
                    Originally posted by AKATheMack View Post
                    You forgot to add that Mayweather has been criticized in recent fights for choosing fighters with no real chance of winning and that he had never asked for these tests before. C'mon you cant explain it to her in a biased way and expect her answer to be unbiased. You kids crack me up, both sides.
                    Mayweather's pass has nothing to do with Pacquiao's decision to decline and make himself look guilty. You act like I lied about the situation.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP