I'll just repost my response to this from the other thread.
Wow! I stop reading after this. "According to a source" doesn't really sound that convincing or credible. I'll give you guys another example that is very similar to this.
Now do you guys think that's true, credible, and convincing. Probably not, but it is the same thing other than it is not published in any media form, but it could easily have been. Unless then can give names, this is BS IMO.
Dan Rather would be a great example. Fabrication in the media is done all the time, whether it's in Politics, Sports, or Entertainment. You have to be pretty naive or clueless if you don't think it's not being done or can't be done. If you don't have a clue what i'm talking about in regards to Dan Rather, you can easily search it when he fabricated a story about President Bush. You can't get any bigger than that.
Wow! I stop reading after this. "According to a source" doesn't really sound that convincing or credible. I'll give you guys another example that is very similar to this.
"According to a source close to Floyd Mayweather", Floyd is a raging *******ual and he ducked Cotto, Mosley, and Margarito. True story.
Dan Rather would be a great example. Fabrication in the media is done all the time, whether it's in Politics, Sports, or Entertainment. You have to be pretty naive or clueless if you don't think it's not being done or can't be done. If you don't have a clue what i'm talking about in regards to Dan Rather, you can easily search it when he fabricated a story about President Bush. You can't get any bigger than that.
Comment