"When the athlete has no advance notice of the test, he or she will be chaperoned continuously from the moment of contact from the testing officials until the sample is provided. The test is usually a urine sample, as this is the easiest and least intrusive means of obtaining bodily fluids for testing. WADA has detailed protocols about the manner in which the sample is physically placed into a test container, the sealing of the container, and its secure transport to an accredited test facility. The test must usually provide for a designated A and B sample, with the B acting as the basis for a second test if the A sample tests positive. The athlete is deemed to have tested positive when both the A and the B samples generate that result."
The USADA is supposed to be an independent agency, yet GBP was allowed to dictate how they were to administer their tests? They don't even take blood from the Olympic athletes until after their competition is done. Up until that point, they mainly perform random urinanalysis. Sounds a little fishy to me.
"Schaefer didn't precisely spell out how the drug testing would be done. He and USADA Chief Executive Travis Tygart have said they don't believe an effective anti-doping policy can be carried out if Pacquiao won't agree to test any time in the 30-day period before the fight."
What interest does Tygart have in this fight? Why is he out there like one of the promoters implying Pacquiao won't take any kind of test, even urine, in the 30 day window? Pacquiao has stated numerous times that they can test his urine any time. And according to USADA policy on testing Olympic athletes-urine is used leading up to competition as it is "the easiest and least-intrusive means of testing of bodily fluids."
So why Mr. Tygart, are you saying that urine testing leading up to the fight is insufficient? Pacquiao is already bending over backwards by agreeing to a blood test, at all, before the fight. So it makes me wonder how it's ok to use urine for random testing on Olympic athletes but not for this fight. What ties do GBP and TYGART really have? Why was Tygart even this invested in this fight? All these things should be a red flag to what's really going on here.
So bottom line, IF BLOOD AFTER COMPETITION is good enough for the Olympics, why is it being changed for this fight?
The USADA is supposed to be an independent agency, yet GBP was allowed to dictate how they were to administer their tests? They don't even take blood from the Olympic athletes until after their competition is done. Up until that point, they mainly perform random urinanalysis. Sounds a little fishy to me.
"Schaefer didn't precisely spell out how the drug testing would be done. He and USADA Chief Executive Travis Tygart have said they don't believe an effective anti-doping policy can be carried out if Pacquiao won't agree to test any time in the 30-day period before the fight."
What interest does Tygart have in this fight? Why is he out there like one of the promoters implying Pacquiao won't take any kind of test, even urine, in the 30 day window? Pacquiao has stated numerous times that they can test his urine any time. And according to USADA policy on testing Olympic athletes-urine is used leading up to competition as it is "the easiest and least-intrusive means of testing of bodily fluids."
So why Mr. Tygart, are you saying that urine testing leading up to the fight is insufficient? Pacquiao is already bending over backwards by agreeing to a blood test, at all, before the fight. So it makes me wonder how it's ok to use urine for random testing on Olympic athletes but not for this fight. What ties do GBP and TYGART really have? Why was Tygart even this invested in this fight? All these things should be a red flag to what's really going on here.
So bottom line, IF BLOOD AFTER COMPETITION is good enough for the Olympics, why is it being changed for this fight?
Comment