Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

*******S: Give me ONE legitimate reason why Pacquiao shouldn't be tested.

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #71
    Originally posted by hugh grant View Post
    First PBF explain why he is singling out Pac for this treatment he hasnt given anyone else? He never asked DLH for one, so how is it not just mind games here? Why wasnt it possible that DLH could gain an unfair advantage over PBF? WHy wasnt PBF concerned about DLH?

    Pac has passed every test ever, so dont deserve this su****ion. Dont PBF trust the tests that Pac has had?
    No because his piss was tested twice for each fight and he is only required to get his blood tested once by the commission in order to be able to fight for the YEAR.

    Comment


      #72
      the only legitimate reason is that he is on something

      Comment


        #73
        Originally posted by PR miguel cotto View Post
        the only legitimate reason is that he is on something
        And there you go. Pacquiao has secrets and could even be on something as we speak. Denying the allegations and negating demands to get his system clean using stall tactics is the only thing I see him doing right now.

        Comment


          #74
          What's the name of the girl in your sig?

          Comment


            #75
            **** this fight, boxing will move on.

            Comment


              #76
              Actually i dont mind not seeing the fight now. As long as someone else kicks PBFs ass i dont care.

              Pac will win his 8th title in the next weight class then.

              Comment


                #77
                if bernie madoff were to accuse you of being a thief, without any evidence at all, out of the blue, and insists on going over you things at any day/time that he wants just to make sure that you're innocent, would comply or even take him seriously? would you say yes?

                judging by the photo from your sig., you're not looking for legitimate reasons but rather out there to stir up further controversy.

                since when is a person guilty until proven innocent? i think you were born in the wrong era, you're more fit to be participating in in witch hunts and lynching.

                Comment


                  #78
                  Coz he's clean?

                  10 NSAC testing says so.

                  Comment


                    #79
                    Originally posted by pnksntdead View Post
                    if bernie madoff were to accuse you of being a thief, without any evidence at all, out of the blue, and insists on going over you things at any day/time that he wants just to make sure that you're innocent, would comply or even take him seriously? would you say yes?

                    judging by the photo from your sig., you're not looking for legitimate reasons but rather out there to stir up further controversy.

                    since when is a person guilty until proven innocent? i think you were born in the wrong era, you're more fit to be participating in in witch hunts and lynching.
                    This is what I've been saying all along. I even made a similar comparison (Salem Witch trials).

                    Comment


                      #80
                      Originally posted by Chups View Post
                      Coz he's clean?

                      10 NSAC testing says so.
                      10 NSAC PISS tests say so.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP