Again, I made a simple correction to something you said, and you flew off on a hissy fit about how I was implying Wlad was a bum.
Simple psychology lesson for you: This is becasue deep down indide YOU THINK HE IS, and are so wound up and hyper defensive you attack anyone who says somehting the least bit critical about him.
Again, unless you can show me where I said anything out of line and explain in a clear and mature manner why you take issue with what I said, don't bother talking to me.
All I have now is several guys refusing to take issue with anything I said in specific, and calling me a do do head.
Again, WEAK.
I see you broke out the dictionary to see how to spell psychology, but didn't bother with the simpler words, I guess you just type the normal everyday words the way you pronaounce them. Again, stop being a *** and own up to your implications. For example, counting KDs scored on a fighter after he is already hurt, WTF? Joe Frazier was dropped what, six times against Foreman, and didn't get off the canvas to win. Does that mean he was washed up at that point? Hell no, of course not. It's **** like that which cancels out any valid points you make. I said already that I have no problem with saying he isn't there yet, but acting like he doesn't have a chance is just silly.
Again, stop being a *** and own up to your implications. For example, counting KDs scored on a fighter after he is already hurt, WTF? Joe Frazier was dropped what, six times against Foreman, and didn't get off the canvas to win. Does that mean he was washed up at that point? Hell no, of course not. It's **** like that which cancels out any valid points you make. I said already that I have no problem with saying he isn't there yet, but acting like he doesn't have a chance is just silly.
More NON SENSE on your part.
I'll just keep repeating myself, hoping sooner or later it will sink in.
I corrected your take on the knock down in the Williamson fight because you were wrong.
Not at anytime before or after that did I say anything in regards to him being a bum.
Originally posted by hollister
Joe Frazier was dropped what, six times against Foreman, and didn't get off the canvas to win. Does that mean he was washed up at that point? Hell no, of course not.
Once again, where did I say Wlad was washed up? Care to point that out to me??
You can't because AGAIN you're putting words in my mouth.
Like I said, unless you want to argue a specific point, all you're doing is making yourself look silly.
I already explained to you that you seem to sense these "implications" because of what you fear to be true
deep down inside.
I never called Wlad a bum. I just said he got knocked out by two of them.
Keep putting words in my mouth though. Its worked really well for you thus far. That's a great strategy for debating in a boxing forum. Just pretend someone said something they didn't and attack them for it.
More NON SENSE on your part.
Keep putting words in my mouth though. Its worked really well for you thus far. That's a great strategy for debating in a boxing forum. Just pretend someone said something they didn't and attack them for it.
Great job.
I see you proofread your post this time, a real step in the right direction if I do say so myself, but it's nonsense, you're just being stubborn.
I see you proofread your post this time, a real step in the right direction if I do say so myself, but it's nonsense, you're just being stubborn.
I didn't proof read anything. I type quickly and without regard for spelling at times. Unless its so distracting you can't understand, that's slightly less weak than all the words you've put in my mouth.
You're the one who's being stubborn. So stubborn all you can do is attack me for things I haven't said.
So far you've accused me of calling Wlad a bum, saying he's finished, and saying that the knockdown in the Williamson fight was a devistating one.
I didn't say any of those things, nor do I think them.
Again, unless you're going to attack something I actually said, you're just being petty and vindictive without reason.
How many times and different ways do I have to say I DON'T THINK THERE'S ANYONE HE SHOULD BE FIGHTING INSTEAD.
Castillo is the perfect kind of opponent for Wlad at this point: a smaller Heavyweight (6'2 215) who's green and hasn't beaten anyone worth anything.
I can't help you're absolutly trying to KID yourself about Castillo.
He's had only EIGHT fights at Heavyweight, and fought to a draw agaisnt THIS Cruiserweight .
Castillo is a soft opppent, stop kidding yourself.
And for the 5th time, a soft opponent is EXACTLY what he needs right now.
WOW. I might as well be talking to Wlad's mom here.
Did you even see that fight? I doubt it. I didn't either, but I've read that Castillo was just ****ing around and Aziz made him pay. Though since you seem unable to answer a simple question, I'll leave it at this, if Castillo is as big of a cupcake as you think he is, Wlad will KO him in less than 5 rounds even if he looks like he did against TOS.
Did you even see that fight? I doubt it. I didn't either, but I've read that Castillo was just ****ing around and Aziz made him pay. Though since you seem unable to answer a simple question, I'll leave it at this, if Castillo is as big of a cupcake as you think he is, Wlad will KO him in less than 5 rounds even if he looks like he did against TOS.
I'm begining to think you aren't very bright because I answered you every time.
Castillo has 8 fights at Heavyweight, and is small for a Heavyweight.
He's not even close to a top ten fighter, and is a SOFT opponent, which is exactly what Wlad needs right now.
So far you've accused me of calling Wlad a bum, saying he's finished, and saying that the knockdown in the Williamson fight was a devistating one.
You implied that the KD had an impact on Wlads career, that was enough. Why in the hell else would you even bring it up? It was barely a sidenote...
I didn't say any of those things, nor do I think them.
Originally posted by Bozo_no_no
Again, unless you're going to attack something I actually said, you're just being petty and vindictive without reason.
You know what you were saying, be a man for crying out loud
Comment