Who ranks higher all time RJJ, Hopkins or Calzaghe?

[Hyde]

imo

1. Roy Jones Jr
2. Bernard Hopkins
.
.
.
.
.
3. Joe Calzaghe

[Shattered Jaw]

LMFAO.

Hopkin's resume is garbage and I love the way Calzaghe actually holds a win over Hopkins and yet you rank him far lower!

Worst thread ever.

Any time Hopkins faces someone that isn't **** and is his own size (Green Jones, Taylor x2, Calaghe, Mitchell) he losses.

Also, we shouldn't forget the amazing draw with Segundo Mercado he got after being knocked down twice. Haha. Hopkins beats welterweights....

[Uturn]

jones>zag>hopkins

[Fat Bloke]

Calzaghe
Roy Jones
























































































































Bernard Hopkins

[Pugilistic™]

1.Jones
2. Hopkins
3. Calzaghe

[Hyde]

LMFAO.

Hopkin's resume is garbage and I love the way Calzaghe actually holds a win over Hopkins and yet you rank him far lower!

Worst thread ever.

Any time Hopkins faces someone that isn't **** and is his own size (Green Jones, Taylor x2, Calaghe, Mitchell) he losses.

Calzaghe BARELY beat a 44 year old past prime Hopkins. And in my oppinion Hopkins should have been awarded the win.

Hopkins resume>>>>>>>>>>calzaghes resume
Roy's resume>>>>>>>>>>>>calzaghes resume

[Oasis_Lad]

Roy, though he is severely overrated. And Calzaghe and Hopkins are about even.

[Shattered Jaw]

Calzaghe BARELY beat a 44 year old past prime Hopkins. And in my oppinion Hopkins should have been awarded the win.

Hopkins resume>>>>>>>>>>calzaghes resume
Roy's resume>>>>>>>>>>>>calzaghes resume

No, Calzaghe beat Hopkins. End of.

Hopkins is also not actually that past prime. What a lot of people (idiots - such as yourself) don't realise is that Calzaghe was actually further removed from his prime. You could see Calzaghe's speed, work rate and endurance was not as good as during his prime years (around 30). Hopkins on the other hand, while past prime was actually not far removed from it at all - as proved by the Pavlik demolition.

Hopkin's resume is garbage. He has about 2 good wins - against Tarver and Trinidad. The rest are just big names - they weren't good fighters where Hopkins fought them.

[Hyde]

No, Calzaghe beat Hopkins. End of.

Hopkins is also not actually that past prime. What a lot of people (idiots - such as yourself) don't realise is that Calzaghe was actually further removed from his prime. You could see Calzaghe's speed, work rate and endurance was not as good as during his prime years (around 30). Hopkins on the other hand, while past prime was actually not far removed from it at all - as proved by the Pavlik demolition.

Hopkin's resume is garbage. He has about 2 good wins - against Tarver and Trinidad. The rest are just big names - they weren't good fighters where Hopkins fought them.

a joes resume is better? LMFAO

slappsy beat 2 past prime 40+ year olds, a hyped up lacy and an average kessler and thats pretty much it.

[Schmerzen]

1. roy jones
2. hopkins
3. calzaghe