Does Kessler's loss to Ward hurt Calzaghe's legacy? A lot of posters are jumping all over Calzaghe's resume now that Kessler lost convincingly to Ward. It's hard to say Kessler's loss has no bearing on Calzaghe. On the flip side, if Kessler had won every Super Six fight and dominated the tournament.. A lot of Calzaghe supporters would have come out and said.. Calzaghe beat the guy who dominated the Super Six. So, What type of impact does everyone think Kessler's loss has on Calzaghe? Poll to follow.
-
112Yes Kessler's loss is bad for Calzaghe's legacy.50.00%56No Kessler's loss has no bearing on Calzaghe's legacy.31.25%35Yes, Kessler's loss is bad, but only a little.18.75%21 -
What kind of ****** poll has two yes answers? -
Of course, since there's no reason it should.Comment
-
Um, let's say Ward goes on to a Hall of Fame career...maybe might want to wait until he has 25 fights to ask this?
Comment
-
Makes no difference. JC did it without any fouls, 9 rounds to 3 or maybe 8 rounds to 4.Originally posted by DrewWoodside View Post
| |Comment
-
Well yeah, it just lowers Kessler's stock, thus lowering Calslappys meaningless record to an even lower status.Comment
-
How can it not look bad, his fans would of been making out it looked good for Calzaghe if he went onto to win the whole tournament, so whats the difference.
You cant have it both ways.Comment
-
Well, if you have two eyes a brain and can read you'll notice one of the yes options specifies "but only a little." Allow me to translate that into lamens terms for you. That means "Yes" but not that much. Hit those books kiddo!Originally posted by VipersThunder View PostComment
-
Calzaghe's career is even more of a joke than it already was.Comment
Comment