I love this thread, this proves once and for all that *****s are dumb as ****.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Pacquiao should get fighter of the decade now for sure.
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by sycomantz View Post2011 is the start of the new decade. jan 1 2000- dec 31 2010 is one decade.
Floyd is fighter of the decde b/c hes going to stomp pacOriginally posted by sycomantz View Postno. you began counting at 2001. 2000 to 2001 make 2001, year one of the new decade
if you start counting the new decade at 2000, from 2000 to 2010 makes 11 years.
you start counting at 2001. 2000 to 2001 is year 1, 2002 year 2, 2003 year 3, 2004 year 4,, 2005 year 5, 2006 year 6, 2007 year 7, 2008 year 8, 2009 year 9, 2010 year 10 which ends on dec 31 2010 not dec 31 2009Originally posted by sycomantz View Postlets see fool. so you are telling me that jan 1 2000 marks the end of the first year of the new decade?
NO you dumbass, dec 31 2000 is the day that ends the first year of the new decade...genius therefore you count a decade from the begining of the decade, jan 1 2000 to the end of the decade which is dec 31 2010.
do the math. jan 1 2000 to dec 31 2010 makes one calendar year...10 years
jan 1 2000 to jan 1 2011 makes 10years plus 1 day starting the new decade....2011
COUNT LOSEROriginally posted by sycomantz View Post2000 to 2009 is 9 years your dumbass.
2000 through 2010 is 10 years...idiots hahaOriginally posted by sycomantz View Posta decade is a period of 10 years.
2000 to 2009 is 9 years...what dont you understand?
I never thought i would be humbled by ******ity.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by sycomantz View Post2011 is the start of the new decade. jan 1 2000- dec 31 2010 is one decade.
Floyd is fighter of the decde b/c hes going to stomp pac
thats 10. a decade is 10 yrs.
2000 is the start of the decade. 2000 is the start of the millenium.
People would count 2000-2099 as a century. Since the century starts at 2000. if the the century starts at 2000 then you should start counting from there.
2000 1
2001 2
2002 3
2003 4
2004 5
2005 6
2006 7
2007 8
2008 9
2009 10
Please learn to count
2009 is the end of the decade. Pacquiao has outdone floyd in this decade.
Pacquiao is the fighter of the decade.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Iceta View PostI am a fan of Pacquiao even though I'm not a hardcore worshipper like some people are. And up until the Cotto victory, I actually thought that Bernard Hopkins had just as good of a case for it with wins over Wright, Pavlik, Tarver, Trinidad, a more prime De La Hoya than Pacquiao fought, and being so consistent past 40. I never even thought Mayweather belonged in this discussion and I would give the award to Hopkins or Pacquiao before him because of the way Floyd cherry picked his opponents. The reason why I gave this as a slight edge to Bernard is because I didn't think all that highly of Pacquiao's wins over De La Hoya, Hatton, and David Diaz. I thought the victory over JMM was good even if the fight was close. But Pacquiao's win over Cotto would make me give him the award for sure now, no questions asked.
first post i actually agree with you....................
Comment
-
Comment