Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pacquiao should get fighter of the decade now for sure.

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    I love this thread, this proves once and for all that *****s are dumb as ****.

    Comment


      Originally posted by sycomantz View Post
      2000 to 2009 is 9 years your dumbass.

      2000 through 2010 is 10 years...idiots haha
      decade is Jan 1, 2000 - Dec 31, 2009 is 10 years dumbass

      Comment


        Originally posted by Bujay View Post
        sig of the decade...HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
        The title should be replaced with that

        Comment


          Originally posted by sycomantz View Post
          2011 is the start of the new decade. jan 1 2000- dec 31 2010 is one decade.

          Floyd is fighter of the decde b/c hes going to stomp pac
          Originally posted by sycomantz View Post
          no. you began counting at 2001. 2000 to 2001 make 2001, year one of the new decade

          if you start counting the new decade at 2000, from 2000 to 2010 makes 11 years.

          you start counting at 2001. 2000 to 2001 is year 1, 2002 year 2, 2003 year 3, 2004 year 4,, 2005 year 5, 2006 year 6, 2007 year 7, 2008 year 8, 2009 year 9, 2010 year 10 which ends on dec 31 2010 not dec 31 2009
          Originally posted by sycomantz View Post
          lets see fool. so you are telling me that jan 1 2000 marks the end of the first year of the new decade?

          NO you dumbass, dec 31 2000 is the day that ends the first year of the new decade...genius therefore you count a decade from the begining of the decade, jan 1 2000 to the end of the decade which is dec 31 2010.

          do the math. jan 1 2000 to dec 31 2010 makes one calendar year...10 years

          jan 1 2000 to jan 1 2011 makes 10years plus 1 day starting the new decade....2011

          COUNT LOSER
          Originally posted by sycomantz View Post
          2000 to 2009 is 9 years your dumbass.

          2000 through 2010 is 10 years...idiots haha
          Originally posted by sycomantz View Post
          a decade is a period of 10 years.

          2000 to 2009 is 9 years...what dont you understand?




          I never thought i would be humbled by ******ity.

          Comment


            Originally posted by sycomantz View Post
            nope, im right...bwhahaha
            you're just pretending now that you knew all along. i'd do the same if i were as dumb as you

            your sub par IQ made one of the greatest threads of all time, at least i can give you that

            Comment


              Originally posted by sycomantz View Post
              2011 is the start of the new decade. jan 1 2000- dec 31 2010 is one decade.

              Floyd is fighter of the decde b/c hes going to stomp pac
              2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009
              thats 10. a decade is 10 yrs.

              2000 is the start of the decade. 2000 is the start of the millenium.

              People would count 2000-2099 as a century. Since the century starts at 2000. if the the century starts at 2000 then you should start counting from there.

              2000 1
              2001 2
              2002 3
              2003 4
              2004 5
              2005 6
              2006 7
              2007 8
              2008 9
              2009 10
              Please learn to count


              2009 is the end of the decade. Pacquiao has outdone floyd in this decade.
              Pacquiao is the fighter of the decade.

              Comment


                Happy new year.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Iceta View Post
                  I am a fan of Pacquiao even though I'm not a hardcore worshipper like some people are. And up until the Cotto victory, I actually thought that Bernard Hopkins had just as good of a case for it with wins over Wright, Pavlik, Tarver, Trinidad, a more prime De La Hoya than Pacquiao fought, and being so consistent past 40. I never even thought Mayweather belonged in this discussion and I would give the award to Hopkins or Pacquiao before him because of the way Floyd cherry picked his opponents. The reason why I gave this as a slight edge to Bernard is because I didn't think all that highly of Pacquiao's wins over De La Hoya, Hatton, and David Diaz. I thought the victory over JMM was good even if the fight was close. But Pacquiao's win over Cotto would make me give him the award for sure now, no questions asked.


                  first post i actually agree with you....................

                  Comment


                    That should maybe change though if Pac doesn't take the blood test and he goes on to fight Yuri Forman or Malinaggi and duck guys like Martinez, Williams, Mosley, Mayweather, and Bradley.

                    Comment


                      bump for icea lives

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP