<#webadvjs#>

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

santiago: Pacquiao will be beaten badly this saturday.

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
    #1

    santiago: Pacquiao will be beaten badly this saturday.

    Santiago said that in the last 24/7. i co-sign. there is no way at all that manny will beat Miguel, as a matter of fact, manny will be so badly beaten that he will not be able to fight again till at least june 2010, mark my words. all this image created by the media using Oscar/Hatton fights as a springboard to make predictions, will fall like the old Roman empire. COTTO BY KO.
    #2
    Originally posted by Anto View Post
    Santiago said that in the last 24/7. i co-sign. there is no way at all that manny will beat Miguel, as a matter of fact, manny will be so badly beaten that he will not be able to fight again till at least june 2010, mark my words. all this image created by the media using Oscar/Hatton fights as a springboard to make predictions, will fall like the old Roman empire. COTTO BY KO.
    why wouldn't an elite WW not be able to beat badly a former 106 lber?

    Comment

      #3
      Originally posted by Pullcounter View Post
      why wouldn't an elite WW not be able to beat badly a former 106 lber?
      How many former flyweight champs have competed for a welterweight title?

      Comment

        #4
        Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
        How many former flyweight champs have competed for a welterweight title?
        none that I know of.

        Comment

          #5
          PullCounter needs to be banned for trolling. He posts this in every thread.

          Comment

            #6
            Originally posted by Pullcounter View Post
            none that I know of.
            The 106 lb thing is getting old. He was like 15 years old. I think I weighed 106 when I was 12, doesn't mean I'm still 106.

            Pac's a solid LW/JrWW, he's just not a WW.

            Comment

              #7
              Originally posted by Pullcounter View Post
              none that I know of.
              So what do you base your statement on? Since this obviously isn't your regular former 106ber?

              Comment

                #8
                Originally posted by Moe Howard View Post
                The 106 lb thing is getting old. He was like 15 years old. I think I weighed 106 when I was 12, doesn't mean I'm still 106.

                Pac's a solid LW/JrWW, he's just not a WW.
                Did you weight 106 at 17? If so, then you should have seen a doctor.

                Comment

                  #9
                  I think Mayweather weighed about 106 when he was 15. Manny fought like 3 fights at that weight.

                  Comment

                    #10
                    Originally posted by fabzmm View Post
                    PullCounter needs to be banned for trolling. He posts this in every thread.
                    every thread is a rehash of the same argument!!! hence the same posts... i'm just to lazy to rephrase it over and over again like the rest of you

                    Originally posted by Moe Howard View Post
                    The 106 lb thing is getting old. He was like 15 years old. I think I weighed 106 when I was 12, doesn't mean I'm still 106.

                    Pac's a solid LW/JrWW, he's just not a WW.
                    hence "former" 106 lber... not "current" 106 lber.

                    Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
                    So what do you base your statement on? Since this obviously isn't your regular former 106ber?
                    the argument goes like this: pac is ain't no WW. 106 lbs is just a number to show you all that pac ain't a WW and that he's either on the verge of eternal greatness or a great fall becaues of pride.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP