Anyone here uses that Gamblers Advisory?

[NakiFan]

This guy has great boxing knowledge, and is unbiased.

His predictions are usually very good with a few mistakes.

[Pullcounter]

This guy has great boxing knowledge, and is unbiased.

His predictions are usually very good with a few mistakes.

he got the froch/dirrell wrong.

[The Hammer]

When he gets them wrong, he deletes the YouTube video of himself making the prediction.

When he gets it right, the video stays on YouTube.

But he does know his boxing.

[NakiFan]

He thinks Haye will lose to Valuev btw tunney

[P.WILL]

he got the froch/dirrell wrong.

what was his prediction? i thought dirrell won the boxing match

[!! Shawn]

This guy has great boxing knowledge, and is unbiased.

His predictions are usually very good with a few mistakes.

He has no boxing knowledge, and his predictions are usually 100% incorrect and do not come close to prediction how the fight will unfold.

Take Froch vs Dirrell for example. They said Froch was going to beat Dirrell from the outside using his reach... You are joking right?

That is exactly the opposite of what happened.

[S A M U R A I]

This guy has great boxing knowledge, and is unbiased.

His predictions are usually very good with a few mistakes.

I had more predictions correct than he does, yet people call me a dumbass. Maybe I need a YouTube channel to confirm my extraordinary greatness.



| |

[S A M U R A I]

he got the froch/dirrell wrong.

Calzaghe-Jones, too. He got something else wrong, might have been Hopkins-Pavlik.



| |

[P.WILL]

i dont see adamek being able to overwhelm(sp?) golata

- gamblers advisory

[The Hammer]

He thinks Haye will lose to Valuev btw tunney

I hope he's right, but I think Haye will probably win.

Valuev is a live underdog IMO, he has about a 40% chance of winning. He has a great chin and stamina and he's a smart boxer, but he's too slow.