Maaaan thats some serious holding !
-
-
Now find the video that counts Froch's rabbit punches. Or just a video of the ref signaling a warning to Froch for doing it....over and over and over again. -
he only held from round 7-9(i think cant remember that well)
from round 1-5 no holding AT ALL
from round 9-12 no holding AT ALL
base your biased ass decision because he held for 3 rounds of clinching, and he won those roundsComment
-
dirrell sure did land a lot of punches in that vid and froch didnt. (except for the rabbit punches)Comment
-
Well, after all that holding, no one should ***** about the ref taking the point. He should have done it sooner.Comment
-
could you do us all a favour and just go kill yourself, your racism is so obvious i bet you have no one that loves you this is why you hate anyone that is'nt whiteOriginally posted by Carnivore View PostComment
-
Did you even watch the video you posted? Dirrell would hit Froch 3-4 times if not more with no punches before Froch. Froch would swing wildly coming in leaning forward off balance. His leverage would land him in Dirrell's chest. I would have clinched him as well to keep from being bowled over. Froch fights like a caveman. You really need to study up on what "Boxing" really is. As a matter of fact go to your library and get a Calzaghe fight.Comment
-
froch won a S.D in a close Fight
get the **** over it
Comment
-
Sorry but Dirrell stating he had no idea why he was docked a point is a joke.
He has ability but from ringside the judges tired of his tedious holding and grappling and gave the rounds to Froch.Comment
-
It has nothing to do with race, bro. I was defending the actions of the ref deducting the point, and don't forget, he is black too.Originally posted by Swirls View Post
Dirrell fought a cowardly and negative fight - he ran, held, fell, and bitched too much. I had bet on him to win, but I had no problem with the decision.Comment
Comment