Mielnicki used to get really high praise from Joe Goossen (his former trainer), so that's not unexpected. He seems a bit slow and hittable and doesn't project the aura of a special fighter. High bar? Yeah maybe, but most solid pros aren't special, either. Not everyone can be above average, by definition.
Vito is a decent fighter, I wouldn't say I've seen anything that stands out. He's benefitted from being a young, Italian fighter from the northeast that had some early promotion nap backing. So long as he can drive ticket sales or bring in viewers, he will continue his campaign....against soft competition.
Vito is a decent fighter, I wouldn't say I've seen anything that stands out. He's benefitted from being a young, Italian fighter from the northeast that had some early promotion nap backing. So long as he can drive ticket sales or bring in viewers, he will continue his campaign....against soft competition.
In that sense he's what's good about boxing - a regional fan favorite who has connected with his base, and vice versa. The Brits seem to have much more of that going on. The attraction is the identification with the fighter, not the aura of (potential) superstardom. That makes Mielicki's notoriety genuine, and I appreciate that, even if I'm critical of his absolute skills.
In that sense he's what's good about boxing - a regional fan favorite who has connected with his base, and vice versa. The Brits seem to have much more of that going on. The attraction is the identification with the fighter, not the aura of (potential) superstardom. That makes Mielicki's notoriety genuine, and I appreciate that, even if I'm critical of his absolute skills.
Similar feelings toward Vito. It's when a broadcast tries to tell us he's something that he's not that I get annoyed. Look at a guy like Cornflake LaManna or even Jimmy Lange. Regional-level fighters who were able to parlay that into some decent exposure.
Comment