<#webadvjs#>

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Claressa Shields vs. Danielle Perkins is now for the undisputed heavyweight championship

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Comments Thread For: Claressa Shields vs. Danielle Perkins is now for the undisputed heavyweight championship

    All four heavyweight world titles ? three of them vacant, one of which never existed before ? will be on the line when Claressa Shields takes on Danielle Perkins on February 2.
    [Click Here To Read More]

    #2
    This is silly. Everything above 168 should just be heavyweight for women. There is no need for light heavyweight, cruiserweight, or (god forbid) bridgerweight when there are so few female fighters above 168.

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by famicommander View Post
      This is silly. Everything above 168 should just be heavyweight for women. There is no need for light heavyweight, cruiserweight, or (god forbid) bridgerweight when there are so few female fighters above 168.
      The rare case where the WBC is actually doing something right...

      Comment


        #4
        Three vacant titles. If women’s boxing wants more legitimacy they drastically need to reduce the titles.

        Comment


          #5
          Female boxing above 147 is a joke.

          Comment


            #6
            It must be nice to be considered great by beating school bus drivers and soccer moms. Women's boxing in the higher weight classes is a joke.

            Comment


              #7
              I guess I’ll just enjoy the fight.

              Comment


                #8
                Shields will be acting like it's Ali beating Liston when she beats this woman, who probably has a side job at Burger King, for all the belts. Rematch Marshall, fight the Face of Boxing (Jake Paul) Get back in the cage, or retire. Nash out - His Excellency

                Comment

                Working...
                X
                TOP