Comments Thread For: Bob Arum: Anthony Joshua figures in the plans of Tyson Fury, win or lose

[Bob]

The conquer of Charles Martin has earned it by (checks notes) being annihilated by Dubois and losing 18 out of 24 rounds to Usyk.

& those epic opponents molina & brazeale smh for his first 2 defences before he cleaned up all the shot 38-41 yr olds in the division. Who's he ever beaten??

[thack]

I understand Joshua is popular , I don't completely understand why , but he is only being talked about because of popularity .It can't be on merit as he's just been smashed to bits AGAIN by a rank outsider .If it makes money it makes sense I suppose BUT there's much better fighters who deserve it more than Anothony Joshua . I hope Fury wins and there is a trilogy .Dubious would hammer Joshua again , I think that Wardley would do the job too , maybe even 19 year old Moses , time to move on!

[Hustle]

Usyk moving back down to cruiserweight should he win, he's said this on multiple occasions, do you follow boxing? Or just like trolling Fury?

Usyk said moving back down is an option. He didn't say it was definitive so miss me with the bullshi.

How the f#ck am I trolling fury when his team said he'll fight Joshua win or lose.
Dubois beat Joshua, so why would Joshua be next instead of dubois for undisputed if fury wins? Ok then.

Fury is looking for big events. Usyk is looking for competition. Therefore boxing is better off with a usyk win.

how is that trolling? At some point you gotta stop being a fanboy of boxers and be a fan of boxing

[Liondw]

That people would still watch and make it a box office hit is not in dispute, but the appeal has waned.

Joshua already lost twice to Usyk and got ko'd by Dubois. The fight we want to see is this weekend, the last big one of 2024, Usyk and Fury, two best heavyweights.

[Mushashi]

Just another British domestic scrap if Fury loses

[tokon]

" . . causing a three-year absence following his testing positive for steroids and 2015 upset victory over long-reigning champion Wladimir Klitschko."

There! Someone didn't include the relevant facts for done reason.