This fool better not retire bc he's already shown enough major ******ity before the age of 30, he'll be broke by the time he's 40. Don't become Broner 2.0, Tank.
-
-
-
Tank is following Al haymons playbook to a tee. He beat Lamont then maybe once more in 2025 and “retire”. Come back to rematch rygarComment
-
I really don't get how anybody, even fanboys, can back Tank at this point.
I think he is a great fighter, but at this point... 30 years old, his resume has nothing of substance. He could have been one of the greats of this generation, but he lacks any top tier fight, what is that? People mock Broner, he has an infinitely better resume than Tank... Shameful really.
Teofimo which hasn't been regarded as highly as Tank, Haney or Shakur probably has the best resume of that group of young boxers. Bud laid the foot off the gas after unifying super-light and having proper wins against champions. What has Tank even done? He desperately needs the Lomachenko fight, but even if it doesnt happen late enough Loma could turn back the clock, hand him a loss and wreck his career.
Idk... Tank, you gotta step up man... It is not even best money wise. If he fought more and against slightly better opposition he would be making far more and be far better regarded...
Comment
-
Nobody would notice if he retired. He fights low tier opponents.Comment
-
Even casuals are starting to hold him accountable for his choice of opponents so now here comes the retirement talk to justify more tune ups.Comment
-
I like Tank and was impressed when he took on Pedraza and defeated him. Unfortunately his career has been stagnant ever since. Smaller fighters, outmatched opponents and guys who are shopworn. Incredibly underwhelming.Comment
Comment