Originally posted by famicommander
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Too many IBF leading contenders don't merit any ranking, let alone mandatory status
Collapse
-
Originally posted by elfag View Postyeah IBF is trash. *** them its the 3 belt era now, no more 4 belt era. Their mandatories are complete trash, every time its some random nobody you never heard of before is the mandatory and they play hardball and take away the belt even when these guys got contractual rematches.
If you have all 3 belts that arent IBF then I consider you the unified champion still.
Comment
-
Originally posted by famicommander View Post
He was ranked based off a robbery. Plain and simple.
And even if that were true, so was Ricky Burns, who you deem "elite and great win" for Crawford () on the sole reason due to being ranked in the Top 5 when THAT was an actual robbery. So, explain?
It's just overt contradiction from you. There is no way around it from whatever goalpost you try to move, it just comes straight back to that .It's genuinely embarrassing honestly.
You put all this stock into rankings, don't shut the fuck up about them, cite them all the time to justify your undying fanboyism for the likes of Inoue etc by deeming totally dead average fighters as "elite wins" for no other reason than they are ranked highly then turn around and say fighters ranked in the exact same position "suck" because it doesn't fit your pathetic agenda.
Sorry, won't wash. Either be consistent on your position or shut the fuck up. Those are your only two options.Last edited by IronDanHamza; 10-23-2024, 01:39 PM.
Comment
-
Comment