Originally posted by SUBZER0ED
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Marvin Hagler, Terence Crawford, and the importance of knowing when to settle down
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by TheOneAboveAll View Post
Check the records. Hearns did move up to fight Hagler. In fact, Hagler's three biggest fights (Hearns, Duran, SRL), the ones that made him famous, were against guys moving up in weight. Two of those opponents' best weights were 2-4 weight classes below MW. These are not insignificant facts when evaluating and comparing ATGs.Last edited by joseph5620; 08-07-2024, 05:00 PM.SouthpawRight likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
It´s amazing to read these WOKE writers who have a pro Afro agenda, it´s funny to say the least and full of jaf truths and lies. For example it says that Crawfrod is 5'8 and "clearly a welterweight". So is Canelo !!!! He´s 5'8 and should be a 154 pounder at most but he dared to be great and moved up from 147 to 175. He even fought one of the best at 175, Bivol, when he had no need to do it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by TheOneAboveAll View Post
Who is Marvelous Marvin Hagler without those three fights? Every fighter's record is subject to scrutiny, especially those who would claim ATG status. Hagler was objectively a great fighter, but it is important to put his record and wins in context. He is primarily famous for fighting smaller greats of his day.
Last edited by IRONCHINHAGLER; 08-07-2024, 05:22 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Greenfield02 View Post
How about all the WW at the time he moved up? He priced himself out constantly and used that as an excuse while everyone else beat each other up. He waited until every was at the end of their run before he considered fighting them. Not too mention he ducked Ennis and has no desire fighting the best and is only looking for a money grab with Canelo.
Comment
-
Originally posted by TheOneAboveAll View Post
GGG beats everyone you named. I didn't say Hagler wasn't a great fighter. Read my prior posts. I said he was objectively great, but that he is MOST famous (and regarded as an ATG) for his three fights against smaller contemporary greats. Without those fights, nobody but the hardest of hardcore fans would be talking about him today. That should not really be in dispute.IRONCHINHAGLER likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Age and the fact that it was his first fight at 154 had probably more incidence on his performance than just the weight. Also, styles make fights (fighting Madrimov is no piece of cake). Plus anyone can have an off night. Let's see him against Ortiz or Tzyzu at 154, then we'll have a better idea if he can move up one more time.LAchargers373 likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by TonyRespectful View PostBud is a great fighter just not as great as his most rabid fans would have us believe.At a neutral site Bud would have got at best a draw against Madrimov.He’s reached his ceiling at 154 and Tszyu,Ortiz,Ennis and Fundora would present major problems for Bud . Middleweight ? Fuhget about it !greeneye99 likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dee @ PYP Boxing View Post
I hear you. You also have to admit, Bud fought the best of his era, or at least, the best that would fight him. Aside from Pacquiao and Mikey Garcia, who did But miss throughout his career?
Comment
-
Originally posted by steeve steel View PostAge and the fact that it was his first fight at 154 had probably more incidence on his performance than just the weight. Also, styles make fights (fighting Madrimov is no piece of cake). Plus anyone can have an off night. Let's see him against Ortiz or Tzyzu at 154, then we'll have a better idea if he can move up one more time.steeve steel likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
Comment