Comments Thread For: Hearn Admits Possible Benn-Pacquiao Fight In London Depends On Appeal

[Get em up]

just ring up bumgardner and ask how she managed to do it, there needs to be fairness across the board

A B L O W J O B goes a long way I'm not sure if Benn is willing to go that far LMAO

[RJJ-94-02=GOAT]

It’s definitely not happening in London and very likely not happening at all.

Hopefully that bum Benn never gets a cash out fight, he doesn’t deserve a payday and I still maintain he’s probably not good enough to win a British title. Absolute fraud.

[IronDanHamza]

He will take a backdated 2 year uk ban and fight again in the uk this year

More likely the appeal of the hearing UKAD/BBBoC lost get's rejected and he doesn't get a ban at all.

He already won his hearing with UKAD and got his suspension lifted. It's unlikely an appeal with overturn it.

[Boxing 112]

More likely the appeal of the hearing UKAD/BBBoC lost get's rejected and he doesn't get a ban at all.

He already won his hearing with UKAD and got his suspension lifted. It's unlikely an appeal with overturn it.

He did not win a hearing with UKAD they just released a statement after NADPs decision. Like you mentioned it is UKAD themselves (along with BBBofC) that are appealing the decision of the National Anti-Doping Panel.

Benn did everything to avoid ukad/bbbofc first trying to bypass via wbc then trying to via the independent NADP. So yeah those 2 cleared him but the actual uk board bbbofc and ukad he didn't want to co-operate with.

[IronDanHamza]

He did not win a hearing with UKAD they just released a statement after NADPs decision. Like you mentioned it is UKAD themselves (along with BBBofC) that are appealing the decision of the National Anti-Doping Panel.

Benn did everything to avoid ukad/bbbofc first trying to bypass via wbc then trying to via the independent NADP. So yeah those 2 cleared him but the actual uk board bbbofc and ukad he didn't want to co-operate with.

Wrong. That is the hearing with UKAD.

If you (the accused) claim of no wrong doing and have the hearing to protest your innocence then the hearing is undergone The NADP, that's how hearings work in the UK, cite the most recent examples of this; Zolani Tete and Glowacki to which they had their hearings under the same precedent but were seen guilty and given a ban.

UKAD don't literally do the hearing themselves, how can they? It's them vs the boxer being accused that's the entire reason the NADP come into play so it's a fair hearing.

So again, he has literally had his hearing with UKAD/BBBoC to which they lost. (And now being appealed) so not only did Benn not "avoid" the hearing he did the literal opposite and underwent it, and won.

[Boxing 112]

Wrong. That is the hearing with UKAD.

If you (the accused) claim of no wrong doing and have the hearing to protest your innocence then the hearing is undergone The NADP, that's how hearings work in the UK, cite the most recent examples of this; Zolani Tete and Glowacki to which they had their hearings under the same precedent but were seen guilty and given a ban.

UKAD don't literally do the hearing themselves, how can they? It's them vs the boxer being accused that's the entire reason the NADP come into play so it's a fair hearing.

So again, he has literally had his hearing with UKAD/BBBoC to which they lost. (And now being appealed) so not only did Benn not "avoid" the hearing he did the literal opposite and underwent it, and won.

Napd is not the same as co-operating with the bbbofc,he avoided them

[SUBZER0ED]

It's pretty sad when a 27-year-old starts chasing a fight with a retired 45-year-old, with hopes that it will put him on the map of relevance.

[IronDanHamza]

Napd is not the same as co-operating with the bbbofc,he avoided them

Well, of course not because he has pleaded not guilty to the crime essentially. (The failed drug test)

Co-operating with the BBBoC is the equivalent to taking a plea deal and means you don't have a hearing, you just admit wrong doing and receive a ban.

When you are claiming not guilty of wrong doing, like Benn did, you have a hearing, vs UKAD and BBBoC which is undergone by the NAPD and he has had that hearing, and he won that hearing, and thus his suspension was lifted and made clear to fight, until, the decision was appealed and now that process has to finish which will be imminent.

The legal equivalent would be being arrested for a crime, pleading not guilty, going to court for trial, winning the trial and being seen not guilty and then someone turning around like you have here and saying "he hasn't had a trial" because he didn't take a plea deal or "coperate". It's just asinine.

He's literally had his hearing with UKAD/BBBoC and he won and they lost. That's a literal fact of the matter.

[Boxing 112]

Well, of course not because he has pleaded not guilty to the crime essentially. (The failed drug test)

Co-operating with the BBBoC is the equivalent to taking a plea deal and means you don't have a hearing, you just admit wrong doing and receive a ban.

When you are claiming not guilty of wrong doing, like Benn did, you have a hearing, vs UKAD and BBBoC which is undergone by the NAPD and he has had that hearing, and he won that hearing, and thus his suspension was lifted and made clear to fight, until, the decision was appealed and now that process has to finish which will be imminent.

The legal equivalent would be being arrested for a crime, pleading not guilty, going to court for trial, winning the trial and being seen not guilty and then someone turning around like you have here and saying "he hasn't had a trial" because he didn't take a plea deal or "coperate". It's just asinine.

He's literally had his hearing with UKAD/BBBoC and he won and they lost. That's a literal fact of the matter.

It is not a fact or he would have got his BBBofC license back. He has not got it back nor can he get it back till the outcome of the appeal. Otherwise he would have fought in the UK again. He hasn't cause he cannot get a bbbofc license back yet (i know he can get another one to fight in the uk but the point is about british board license which his team said he will only fight in the UK under)

[komandante]

BBBC have been proven wrong many times