Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Zhang vs parker is the biggest robbery in boxing in the last decade

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    I dunno how anyone can have any perspective outside of what Eff has already written down and expect to be taken seriously. This thread might get more posts, but it's over.

    Comment


      #22
      People who bet on Zhang can certainly feel that way lol.

      Comment


        #23
        Zhang performed so poorly, he was even losing the rounds he got the KD’s in.

        In fact, after the 2nd KD, Parker even came back in that same round to continue outworking and outlanding Zhang, as he was doing before the KD. Yes Parker lost those rounds automatically 10-8. But Zhang fought very poorly altogether.

        Steve Gray’s 114-112 for Parker was the most accurate scorecard of the three. Patrick Morley’s 115-111 wasn’t too bad either, he found 9 rounds to give to Parker and I can absolutely see that much more than I can see a Draw.

        What I can’t see at all is a win for Zhang.
        Damn Wicked Damn Wicked likes this.

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by Mr Giggles View Post
          Tell zhang to throw some punches
          0 punches landed in the 12th

          Comment


            #25
            When Zhang is unable to put some effort because his very limited cardio "he is robbed". But his losses are legit and last night Parker moved enough while also being cautious, threw calculated punches and he won. Calling it "the biggest robbery in boxing in the last decade" is startling.

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by FinitoxDinamita View Post
              People who bet on Zhang can certainly feel that way lol.
              Not even.

              I had money on Zhang.

              He didn't win.
              FinitoxDinamita FinitoxDinamita likes this.

              Comment


                #27
                Not even close. Zhang's output was appalling second half of the fight. He went minutes at a time without throwing punches.

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by Eff Pandas View Post

                  100%. Zhang did more damage, but Joe won more rds.

                  I had Zhang up a point, but had it 6-5-1 Joe on rds & some of those rds I gave Zhang weren't strong Zhang rds imo. They were close, competitive rds. The only strong Zhang rds were the ones he scored a KD in.
                  - - Still youthful Mighty Joe Parker KOs 40 yr old Zhang in the rematch.

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by kiaba360 View Post


                    He's a counter-puncher because he's limited by physical deficiencies. He's too slow and too heavy to be an effective pressure fighter; look at Jarrell Miller. Maybe his speed/stamina would improve if he wasn't so out of shape! It's not like he has to weigh 290+lbs.


                    he is very effective tho. he's not like jarrell miller who got stopped and dropped.


                    no such thing happened here.



                    he is more like old Foreman. underrated defense... but when Old foreman lost on points his face usually wore it with welts and bruises.


                    Zhang didn't have any bruises and was clean while delivering damage. he was very effective in offense and defense. Parker was NOT EFFECTIVE IN HIS OFFENSE OR DEFENSE.

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by paulf View Post

                      Not even.

                      I had money on Zhang.

                      He didn't win.
                      I respect your objectivity..

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP