Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: WBC Head Disagrees With IBF Decision To Strip Title From Terence Crawford: 'As a Fan I'm Sick'

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #61
    Originally posted by ptek View Post

    You sound salty and silly.

    how is it possible to vacate your belts when you've already sign a contract, and the loser has activated his mandatory rematch clause and it's at 147.
    The loser asked for 154.

    Crawford is the one forcing 147 because he knows Spence was drained.

    Which is ducking, because Spence wasn’t ready in December and Crawford wasn’t going to be.

    Comment


      #62
      Originally posted by Leicesterage View Post

      The loser asked for 154.

      Crawford is the one forcing 147 because he knows Spence was drained.

      Which is ducking, because Spence wasn’t ready in December and Crawford wasn’t going to be.
      Errol activated his rematch clause, yes he said hopefully its at 154, but he didn't request it in writing. Neither of them did.

      So stop all this crying like a child hogwash and get the hell over it.

      That fight was dam near 7mths ago now.

      Comment


        #63
        Originally posted by ptek View Post

        Errol activated his rematch clause, yes he said hopefully its at 154, but he didn't request it in writing. Neither of them did.

        That fight was dam near 7mths ago now.
        childishness deleted.

        and yes, Crawford has been inactive for seven months. Now if that were Canelo, NSB would be crapping on him for being inactive and holding up the division. Let’s be consistent

        Comment

        Working...
        X
        TOP