Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why is Fury considered an all time great heavyweight?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Who on Mike Tyson's resume when he was "prime" would Tyson Fury get any credit at all for beating? It's too easy to crap on anyone's resume. Nash out

    Comment


      #12
      he'll be in the conversation but I think most will be skeptical.

      200w.gif?cid=82a1493bgm4sr3uj8dr37klen1gxef9errfnhge49p5b5r62&ep=v1_gifs_search&rid=200w.gif&ct=g.gif

      Comment


        #13
        If he beats Joshua, Usyk, Sanchez, Zhang he is legit.

        I need to see more good wins from him.

        Comment


          #14
          I've seen him lose to McDermott and should've been stopped v Wallin too (it would've been stopped the other way).

          The way he dealt with Wilder head on, is impressive for sure though, he walked down a huge puncher. But Wilder has barely won a round of 'boxing' against even the most novice of boxers for 7 years without a KD. He can't box.

          Fury needs an Usyk fight to be considered the best of this era, as opposed to just a number 1 like any random champion in a division imo.

          All time... Not in the convo imo.

          Comment


            #15
            Because he's huge & skilled

            And he ended the two longest reigns in recent history.

            One loss wipes all that away, though.

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by baroidi View Post
              This HW era is too weak for anyone to be considered an ATG, Wilder is horrible with power, Joshua is basically Frank Bruno in this weak era, Usyk beating Frank Bruno does not make him an ATG HW. That being said, with Fury's size and awkwardness he'll give any HW problems, not saying he'll win.
              Wilder with his power will simply give most past and future heavyweight problems is he an all time great too ?

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by Nash out View Post
                Who on Mike Tyson's resume when he was "prime" would Tyson Fury get any credit at all for beating? It's too easy to crap on anyone's resume. Nash out
                Spinks who got more notable wins than Wilder & Holmes who is way better than Klitschko

                Comment


                  #18
                  I don't even think he'd beat Larry Holmes

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by The D3vil View Post
                    Because he's huge & skilled

                    And he ended the two longest reigns in recent history.

                    One loss wipes all that away, though.
                    Who is the lady in your sig?

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Who said he was?
                      w1cked w1cked likes this.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP