Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Oleksandr Usyk Repeats, Wins Split Decision Over Anthony Joshua To Retain Titles

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    I don't agree with the cards but hey I'm one guy drinking wine and watching fights. Not a bad decision though...both guys can build from this and I dont mind seeing them again!

    Especially Philip, he has a good chance to do the judah dance lol weird reactions or what?

    Comment


      No robbery at all. Zhang blew it. He started strong and faded like crazy. The whole time we thought it was a plan was just a dude almost 40 that didn't have the stamina to keep up the activity that Hrgovic was showing. Totally cool with the decision. Zhang really didn't throw enough and let it slip away rd by rd.

      Comment


        Zhang deserved the w 2nd robbery tonight.

        Comment


          if Zhang had just a bit more stamina, Hrgovic would've been out cold, but alas that is his major flaw

          Comment


            Originally posted by denium View Post
            Zhang busted him up but Hrgovic was far more active, defo no robbery
            There were rounds you could score either way. Hrgovic doing more, Zhang seemingly causing more damage. You can't claim a robbery when your eyes tell you it's close and could go either way

            Hrgovic impressed the judges more. Simple. That's how boxing is scored.

            Comment


              No robbery but those 115-112 cards were ******

              Comment


                Oh SHEET! Haven't seen Buffer in a minute!! Must have pulled him out of the cryo chamber for this one!

                Comment


                  Ha! They brought in Buffer for the main event! How does Dr. Dreadlocks feel?

                  Comment


                    Oh just great we have to sit through an hour long Saudi Arabia promotional video
                    siablo14 siablo14 likes this.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Boxingfanatic75 View Post

                      A close fight (in which it definitely was) is not a “robbery.” I’m suspecting you lack the understanding of what the term “robbery” means in boxing. A case could be made going in both directions for this fight. I suspect a weeeee bit of bias in your judgement. But hey, who am I?
                      1) There'll always be someone who will claim robbery.
                      2) They're building up to claiming robbery in the next fight on the off chance Joshua wins. They've been doing it since about August!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP