Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Am I the only guy who thinks that Sturm can beat Hopkins?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by Runw/knives
    If I saw a member with that name,

    I would drop to my knees and scream:


    WHY!!!!

    With my hands in the air and everything.


    that's not a good idea dude, because if his name is ruizrules, if u drop to u're knees he's gonna fill u up with premium fuel

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by SturmRules
      nah i grew up on tyson sturm is a current fav atm

      Over MAB, Pac Man, Morales, Floyd, Zoo, Gatti, Hopkins, Tito, Winky, Cotto, Judah, Vitali, Lacy, Juan Diaz, Rocky Juarez, Castillo, Corrales, and DLH? (I know there are more, this is the list that spewed out)

      So is it the jab. You have to love him for his jab.

      Comment


        #23
        course i liek vitali more then sturm lol but he is second

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by BROWN BOMBER
          did i misread the first 3 words????
          Everyone on here knows me. They know Im real and one thing I always say is that no matter how much I like a guy, I can still criticize him.

          Comment


            #25
            You guys are wrong. The Hopkins that fought Tito and would beat Sturm but this Hopkins is different. He is getting old and he is slowing down. Sturm has the perfect style to fight him and he wouldve gave a prime Hopkins trouble. His size, defense, and jab would make it hard for Hopkins to reach him and the kid is getting better every fight

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by beeatch!
              not just too quick, but too powerful. we never saw if sturm has a chin because dlh isn't a big puncher at junior middlweight. Hops would give sturm a boxing lesson and then start to bust him up in the later rounds, i think it'd be like eastman
              Come on man, you act like X is Tyson. He doesnt have KO power. He breaks fighters down. Sturm is too big for X to KO

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by mechaaztlan
                I agree with you on your criticism of Hop,well partially anyways,I really believed Hop was trash,only fighting fat wleterweights, but his fight with Eastman put all that too rest, the only person i would give a chance at beating hop is taylor,and he might get schooled,If i didnt think Hop was impressive for those reasons, why would i think Strum is for the same reasons?Strum couldnt put a fat welterweight down, if he was great he would have done what hop did,Sturm won that fight, but it was hardly impressive.Im not exactly an X fan,but i think he's far better than someone like Sturm.
                Come on man, Eastman is a joke. He's solid but thats it. He lost to a washed up Joppy

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by DLT
                  Come on man, Eastman is a joke. He's solid but thats it. He lost to a washed up Joppy
                  All Im saying is Sturm gets too much credit for beating a fat oscar, and on points at that.Eastman was a solid fighter,by no means great,but i wouldnt call him trash, maybe he lost to a washed up joppy,and he didnt do that bad,at least he knocked down joppy,something i believe taylor didnt do,even if that was a largely one sided match.Hopkins,well i dont kno if slowed down or not,but hes a great boxer,he can fight on the outside all day(3 punches a round dosent bother him ),sturm would HAVE to try and be the aggressor if he wanted to land punches, and thats when Hop would shine. Even tho I think it would be entertaining to see strum win, he would then have utterly OWN3D Golden boy promotions . (but i stil say he's average )

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by mechaaztlan
                    All Im saying is Sturm gets too much credit for beating a fat oscar, and on points at that.Eastman was a solid fighter,by no means great,but i wouldnt call him trash, maybe he lost to a washed up joppy,and he didnt do that bad,at least he knocked down joppy,something i believe taylor didnt do,even if that was a largely one sided match.Hopkins,well i dont kno if slowed down or not,but hes a great boxer,he can fight on the outside all day(3 punches a round dosent bother him ),sturm would HAVE to try and be the aggressor if he wanted to land punches, and thats when Hop would shine. Even tho I think it would be entertaining to see strum win, he would then have utterly OWN3D Golden boy promotions . (but i stil say he's average )
                    Yeah but I dont look at who he fought, I look at how he fought and I like his style. I think he can be effective against a guy like X. He has also looked even better since the Oscar fight

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Sturm has fought nobody worth mentioning since he fought DLH. DLH is his the only reason he is even being discussed at the moment. ...Well Sturm did fight Hassine Cherifi, if you think he is worth mentioning. But the only reason Cherifi would be worth mentioning is because Tito wooped his ass.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP