Comments Thread For: Charlo on Crawford: Sit Your Ass Down at 147! Humble Yourself, Go Fight Spence!

[Baba K]

He may be right but too many fighters these days looking for reasons NOT to fight. Charlo - Crawford is a competitive, MONEY fight where he could get a potential W over a future Hall of Famer; I don't see why Charlo wouldn't welcome it. Sugar Ray Leonard COULD have said to Benitez, Duran & Hearns "No...fight this guy or that guy first...or fight each other first...then I'll fight you". But he didn't do that.. he fought them all and then they all ultimately fought each other too. They didn't look for reasons NOT to fight back in the day. I guess the game has changed.

[Dreamking]

It would be the biggest fight of Charlo's ****ty career. He's probably just scared to lose.

[R.I.P Chico]

These jokers at the PBC epitomise everything that is wrong with this sport. Crawford is the best fighter at 147 and everybody knows it. Spence knows it too.

[1hourRun]

I think that Jermell is upset about all of Terence Crawford's clear wins, P4P #1. status, undisputed coronation on the first try ; and his first ballot HOF nomination. One division champs Erroll Spence jr. and Jermell Charlo still need to work a little more to get on Terence Crawfords level.

[BomaE]

As far Spence/Crawford they should fight for 35% each and the winner gets the other 30% that way their egos stay fulfilled and we can finally get that fight. When it comes to Charlo and Bud it's a good fight but I'd still think Bud is the betting favorite even though I wont pick a winner right now.

Crawford is the second best fighter after Canelo and he even have a case of been the best if not for his somewhat poor resume. Charlo stands no chance but the fight would be competitive

[Oregonian]

Crawford is the second best fighter after Canelo and he even have a case of been the best if not for his somewhat poor resume. Charlo stands no chance but the fight would be competitive

———-
Poor resume was my take away from your comment.
Crawford is a really good fighter but has the worst WW resume in the history of boxing.

[Bronx2245]

60/40 for the winner. Shouldn't that solve everything.

Not when one fighter has 3 belts, and the other has only 1. Not to mention Crawford vs. Porter only sold 125K PPVs. Spence won't take less than 60%, nor should he!

[anonymous2.0]

It's just funny to me that Charlo told Crawford to humble himself when Charlo's been acting entitled ever since he was a prospect

[Get em up]

Crawford is the second best fighter after Canelo and he even have a case of been the best if not for his somewhat poor resume. Charlo stands no chance but the fight would be competitive

In my opinion the reason I say I wont a winner right now is activity on Buds part. If he is gonna move up he should go ahead and do it or get a fight signed at 147 and stay busy until Charlo and Castano work out their fight. At his age staying out of the ring for a year and moving up to fight the top tier at 154 could bite him on the a$$ I do agree P4P Bud is bare minimum number 2 if not 1 and 1A with Canelo

[Side Step]

I may be one of the few, but I'd like to see this fight. Both these ********** got game, why wouldn't we want to see a great fight between these two.