Yeah right. He's too busy fighting the worst cruiser available. He's not fighting Beterbiev until he's completely shot.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Arum Believes Canelo Could Go For Beterbiev Title Fight in 2022
Collapse
-
-
When Canelo unified the worst division right now, he plans to move on to fight some paper champ in the second worst division.
And I should give him a credit that he beats Bivol and other 175 champs. Yeah right.
Comment
-
I’m no Canelo fan. I do think however greatness in boxing comes with a fair level of hate. This would be a significant fight for any super middle weight and can’t be diminished just bc it’s Canelo. It wouldn’t be easy and Beterbiev has a style that would be taxing to Canelo, all straights, power jab, brute strength and high connect percentage. I’m mindful that this is bob talking not Canelo, but this would be a great matchupTreyShaw likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
FACT: NONE of those guys were the best in the division... not one
FACT: above 130, Pacquiao only fought the best once... AND HE LOST !!
stop talking shlt
and Pacquiao did not fight Keefe at 154... again, stop talking shlt
...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Boxingfanatic75 View PostDid I say they were “the best?” Go back to my original post again. Additionally conduct just a little research because I’m tired of having to do it for others. Original post said one of the best. Each fighter I named during the time Pac man fought each were one of the best of their division. I know this may be a tough and bitter pill to swallow but those are non debatable facts.
let the record show, the following fact is correct...
FACT: above 130, Pacquiao only fought the best once... AND HE LOST !!
sorry if that is a bitter pill to swallow
..
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Boxingfanatic75 View PostI rest my case
FACT: you said the following statement was incorrect...
FACT: above 130, Pacquiao only fought the best once... AND HE LOST !!
FACT: then... you admitted that statement was 100% correct !!
Did I say they were “the best?
I rest my case
aboutfkntime: dissecting the pac-bullshlt... piece... by... piece... since... well, forever
...
Comment
-
Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
FACT: you said the following statement was incorrect...
FACT: then... you admitted that statement was 100% correct !!
I rest my case
aboutfkntime: dissecting the pac-bullshlt... piece... by... piece... since... well, forever
...
Additionally, how can you classify “the best” without a unification of titles? That’s right you can’t. Usyk was “the best” when he unified. See how easy that is? Manny fought one of the best in each of the divisions I laid out. Now, run along and go play word salad with someone more gulliable.Last edited by Boxingfanatic75; 12-15-2021, 04:05 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Boxingfanatic75 View PostYou can choose to play ******* word salad with me all day. That was meant to say did I say the best. I said he’s fought one of the best in each division. Go back, reread my original post and look for that word “one of.” It’s not that difficult.
Additionally, how can you classify “the best” without a unification of titles? That’s right you can’t. Usyk was “the best” when he unified. See how easy that is? Manny fought one of the best in each of the divisions I laid out. Now, run along and go play word salad with someone more gulliable.
FACT: you scoffed at this post...
FACT: above 130, Pacquiao only fought the best once... AND HE LOST !!
see...
Originally posted by Boxingfanatic75 View PostYou’re delusional if you believe that.
FACT: then... you admitted that post is 100% correct, see...
Did I say they were “the best?
sorry if that is a bitter pill to swallow
Comment
Comment