Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

"Aye test doe" If thats the criteria for p4p then how is Boots/Ortiz/Spence not above Crawford p4p?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    "Aye test doe" If thats the criteria for p4p then how is Boots/Ortiz/Spence not above Crawford p4p?

    Lets take stock,

    Bud was getting schooled by a 10/1 underdog til the weird kd where Porter didn't seem unable to continue in the slightest & his dad was as responsible for the Crawford win as Bud himself was. (Porter wouldn't have been kod imho(hes been down multiple times before & still finished the fight in a very close fight)

    I was going to give Bud his props if he impressively beat Porter by outclassing him but thats not what happened at all. He didn't look like a p4p fighter.

    His entire career y'all been saying"aye test doe" to justify overrating Bud,now that it doesn't apply to him(& never truly did to #1 at least) you are saying "Boots hasn't fought anyone yet doe"

    #2
    boots and ortiz do not have the credentials to back up the claim. Not saying it's a must but neither have a belt.
    Errol could be in that list but short memory shows that errol struggled with porter and crawford took him out regardless of how close the fight was.
    El_Mero El_Mero likes this.

    Comment


      #3
      Bud has always had a great resume the haters just refused to admit it. Viktor Postol is an elite fighter, he made it 12 rounds against Bud when your boogeyman only made it 10. These same haters act like Liam Smith, Kirkland, Matthew Hatton, Chavez Jr, Yildirim are elite but Postol, Diaz, Horn, Brook, Gamboa, Burns are garbage. Disgraceful hate,
      BaguMka BaguMka likes this.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by BZBEE View Post
        boots and ortiz do not have the credentials to back up the claim. Not saying it's a must but neither have a belt.
        Errol could be in that list but short memory shows that errol struggled with porter and crawford took him out regardless of how close the fight was.
        For the longest time y'all been saying that" resume wasn't important to justify rating Bud #1","aye test doe", despite him doing it v horrible underdogs with few fans,that

        " Bud was going to outclass Porter "I been repeatedly told,that" hes levels above Porter & will show it",

        Etc.etc.etc what happened though as expected was that Porter was outclassing Bud with all his top level experience & Bud was the one who looked inferior most the fight(& you know it)

        For the longest time Wilder was called a bum for being bailed out by his power. Well now Bud got bailed out

        For the longest time we been telling you that Bud has tons of flaws & very lil experience v elites,& y'all said Porter had no shot whatsoever
        Last edited by kushking; 11-22-2021, 04:26 PM.
        Fists_of_Fury Fists_of_Fury likes this.

        Comment


          #5
          Crawford
          Lineal, Ring ****zine, and WBO Lightweight Champion
          Lineal, Ring ****zine, WBA, WBC, IBF, WBO Undisputed Super Lightweight Champion
          WBO Welterweight Champion

          Spence is merely a titlist until he wins a lineal crown while Boots and Ortiz have accomplished nothing.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by famicommander View Post
            Crawford
            Lineal, Ring ****zine, and WBO Lightweight Champion
            Lineal, Ring ****zine, WBA, WBC, IBF, WBO Undisputed Super Lightweight Champion
            WBO Welterweight Champion

            Spence is merely a titlist until he wins a lineal crown while Boots and Ortiz have accomplished nothing.
            "You can't use resume for p4p doe"-every Bud fan before Porter,

            now you wanna bring up who he beat at lower divisions
            Fists_of_Fury Fists_of_Fury likes this.

            Comment


              #7
              I had Spence/Porter a draw.


              I didn't score Bud/Porter, but I didn't have to.
              El_Mero El_Mero likes this.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by _Rexy_ View Post
                I had Spence/Porter a draw.


                I didn't score Bud/Porter, but I didn't have to.
                But you also have to take into account intangibles,the moment a fighter is in,etc.

                (I swear to you I was going to give Bud massive respect if he actually outclassed Porter completely like I was told, instead what we seen was more or less what we've seen in every other Porter fight v opponents I been told were not p4p generational talents like Bud)

                Doesn't that say a lot?
                Last edited by kushking; 11-22-2021, 04:34 PM.
                Fists_of_Fury Fists_of_Fury likes this.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by kushking View Post

                  "You can't use resume for p4p doe"-every Bud fan before Porter,

                  now you wanna bring up who he beat at lower divisions
                  What you're doing is mixing arguments from disparate sources to fit whatever weird narrative you're shilling.

                  I've never claimed the eye test is why Crawford was a P4P fighter. It was always based on his accomplishments.

                  There are very few multi-weight lineal champions in boxing right now, and the ones to accomplish that feat didn't do so by accident.
                  El_Mero El_Mero likes this.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Haters are always going to hate, it's pathetic. After the 5th round, Bud completely took over and dominated a guy who had never been dominated by any top competition. If you didn't see that you're either a casual a racist or a hater.
                    El_Mero El_Mero likes this.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP