Comments Thread For: Lennox Lewis Breaks Down Tyson Fury vs. Deontay Widler Trilogy Fight

[elfag]

Wlad was on his 68th fight, 19th year of his pro career and 39 years old when Fury fought him.

[P to the J]

Fury, Wilder and Joshua are all all-time greats right now 'Not very high all-time greats, but since Kiltschko's retirement? It has constantly been these three fighters who have been the dominant force. Joshua has been beaten by Ruiz Junior, but won the rematch 'And he will most likely win against Usyk the in the rematch'.

Wilder could beat Fury tonight, and if that happens 'There could well be a fourth fight, especially if it is a action packed fight'.

You reckon? I’m not sure about that. Maybe I’m too romantic and the threshold is lower than I imagine it to be, but I wouldn’t put Fury there till he’s cleaned everything, I definitely wouldn’t put Wilder there.

I also doubt Joshua’s beating Usyk anyway, but incidentally, think the latter has at least an equal shot as Fury at ATG status.

[PRINCEKOOL]

You reckon? I’m not sure about that. Maybe I’m too romantic and the threshold is lower than I imagine it to be, but I wouldn’t put Fury there till he’s cleaned everything, I definitely wouldn’t put Wilder there.

I also doubt Joshua’s beating Usyk anyway, but incidentally, think the latter has at least an equal shot as Fury at ATG status.

Since Kiltscko's retirement, they are the greats of this era 'Therefore they are all-time greats'.

But they are not ranked above Wladimir Kiltschko.

[P to the J]

Since Kiltscko's retirement, they are the greats of this era 'Therefore they are all-time greats'.

But they are not ranked above Wladimir Kiltschko.

Sure, I take your point, but when does this era end? And if it ends at a defined point, what happens if these guys go ahead and lose every fight from now until it’s end?

[PRINCEKOOL]

Sure, I take your point, but when does this era end? And if it ends at a defined point, what happens if these guys go ahead and lose every fight from now until it’s end?

I don't know mate.

I think, ONE MAN has not really risen to the top as of yet 'Not even Tyson Fury'.

[aboutfkntime]

I don't know mate.

I think, ONE MAN has not really risen to the top as of yet 'Not even Tyson Fury'.

2 minutes ago, you tried to say they are ALL-TIME greats... now, none of them have risen to the top in their own era

Since Kiltscko's retirement, they are the greats of this era 'Therefore they are all-time greats'.

But they are not ranked above Wladimir Kiltschko.

you don't have the faintest idea what you are talking about




here is more nonsense...

Fury, Wilder and Joshua are all all-time greats right now.

there is nothing difficult about this...

now, means now... all-time means, compared to every single fighter in history... THAT IS FKN OBVIOUS !!

there is ONLY one criteria for genuine greatness... as soon as you mention anything else, you are just a dumb casual-fan

WHO DID YOU BEAT?... with consideration given to when/how... that is it, nothing more... boxing has always been that way

greatness is solely based on resume... NAMES, not numbers... nor any other garbage that was recently invented... NAMES !!

none of them are genuine ATG's... Fury could be, we will see... it is a silly discussion to have at this point

this was the best advice you have received on the subject...

that is a oxymoron

you cannot be all-time, now... now, means now... all-time means, compared to every single fighter in history

you can call them great, if you wish... but that is supposed to be a sacred word in the boxing game

they are all standouts, the top fighters of this generation... the elite

but Wilder has never beaten a standout fighter in this generation, and neither has Joshua

Lewis is great

...

[PRINCEKOOL]

2 minutes ago, you tried to say they are ALL-TIME greats... now, none of them have risen to the top in their own era







you don't have the faintest idea what you are talking about




here is more nonsense...






there is nothing difficult about this...

now, means now... all-time means, compared to every single fighter in history... THAT IS FKN OBVIOUS !!

there is ONLY one criteria for genuine greatness... as soon as you mention anything else, you are just a dumb casual-fan

WHO DID YOU BEAT?... with consideration given to when/how... that is it, nothing more... boxing has always been that way

greatness is solely based on resume... NAMES, not numbers... nor any other garbage that was recently invented... NAMES !!

none of them are genuine ATG's... Fury could be, we will see... it is a silly discussion to have at this point

this was the best advice you have received on the subject...








...

They are all-time greats, deep down you know this.

Anthony Joshua & Tyson Fury have now have been involved in two all-time great fights 'And were the victors'.

They are all-time greats, because they are all the dominant forces of this era 'And they have been for a long time'.

To be a all-time great, you need to win a world title, defend the titles, beat the best competition around.

That is what Fury, Wilder and Joshua have done. The competition may not have been great, but they have nevertheless beaten their competition.

Wilder made 10 defenses, Joshua made 7 defenses & is probably going to win his titles back again, Fury is unbeaten and has 1 title defense and 3 great wins.

Note: I cannot really be bothered with this thread or discussion.

[aboutfkntime]

They are all-time greats, deep down you know this.

Anthony Joshua & Tyson Fury have now have been involved in two all-time great fights 'And were the victors'.

They are all-time greats, because they are all the dominant forces of this era 'And they have been for a long time'.

To be a all-time great, you need to win a world title, defend the titles, beat the best competition around.

That is what Fury, Wilder and Joshua have done. The competition may not have been great, but they have nevertheless beaten their competition.

Wilder made 10 defenses, Joshua made 7 defenses & is probably going to win his titles back again, Fury is unbeaten and has 1 title defense and 3 great wins.

Note: I cannot really be bothered with this thread or discussion.

FACT: you are just another idiot casual-fan

FACT: there is only one criteria for greatness, and you did not even mention it LMAO

the nonsense above, should be totally ignored by anyone with any common-sense

to insist that a fighter you admit has not risen to the top in his own era, is a ALL-TIME great... is just casual-fan foolishness

how many minutes have you been following this sport ?






...