I don't think your opinion is unfair or insulting. I just disagree with it. I like Pacquiao, but I almost never rooted for him in his fights for whatever reason (Broner and Floyd being the exception that I did), so its not anything emotional for me. Still, I just think that the challenge Pac has undertaken at 43 yrs old and the significance of the outcome would make a win greater than the fights you mention.
Ok. I just don’t see how it would be more significant than the wins I mentioned, even though it would be significant.
Definitely a Top 25 win EVER in the HISTORY of the sport. For context, Floyd does NOT have a Top 100 win EVER.
The WW division has been ASS since the golden era ~2005-2012ish. Casual fans clung to "WW" because it was previously amazing but once that era passed so too did its talent.
Danny Garcia, Shawn Porter, and Keith Thurman are fringe belt holders against Cotto, Margarito, Mosley, Bradley, Provodnikov, Floyd, and Manny. Hell I think the Ricky Hatton that fought Floyd beats all of Danny Garcia, Shawn Porter, and Keith Thurman and probably TKOs Thurman based on his complete inability to take a body shot.
Yes, Manny beating Spence will be INCREDIBLE and a Top 25 win EVER. It is VERY UNLIKELY Manny wins because Spence is too big to be stopped and Uncle Al ALREADY has the scorecards filled out. I mean. . .one of the judges gave Thurman the win against Manny...LMFAO LMFAO LMFAO LMFAO LMFAO
This is admirable by Manny but even he wins he'll lose on the cards.
I always felt that as well, after 2015 the welterweight division stunk to me. Thurman,Garcia,Porter we’re never special in my eyes. Fights like Thurman-Porter, Thurman-Garcia, Garcia-Porter were just decent fights from decent fighters. None of those fights were memorable, your not going to waste your time rewatching them and that was supposedly PBC huge mega fights. Spence-Porter looked sloppy as hell.
Pacquiao wins huge upset but Spence is no great fighter. He needs to knockout Pacquiao to make a statement
why don't you just say you're discrediting pac for beating spence?
It would a great win from Pacquiao but again it shows how flaw and weak 147 is. Spence losing to 42 year old part time Pacquiao should be embarrassing.
If there's someone in the history of boxing who is a former flyweight champion, very old, past prime, part time boxer and full time senator who can fight and beat a top lb4lb, very big, prime ww champion then it's understandable that this isn't the biggest ww win in the history of boxing.
You're acting like Spence fighting for his first title out of the country like it's a big deal. It isn't. Especially against Brook, who has one good win. I'm laughing at you. Your knowledge of boxing humors me. Spence barely beat Porter. Nobody thinks Porter is a great fighter. Spence is a PBC level champ. He should be able to beat a 42 year old, but looking at who he has fought, maybe not.
———-
So instead of responding to all the other facts I listed, you harp on about Spence traveling to the UK. I NEVER said it was a big deal.
”Barely “ beat Porter? PAC barely beat Marquez three times, PAC got beat by Horn and Bradley and even if he did win, he barely beat those guys.
Let me guess, you’ll come back wit some other points that have nothing to do with anything instead of responding to anything I wrote.
Because your justification makes no sense, that's why. Not all fighters in their 40's today are competing and winning at the highest levels. Just the special ones. I love the Fab 4, but none of them, not even Duran, competed at the top level of the sport as consistently and for as long as Pac. I'm not even a Pac fan and I can say that. As I said earlier, the fights you mention as being greater achievements were supposed to be competitive.
In your earlier message you stated that context was important in your assessment,then you mentioned the fallacy that Duran had to come up two weight classes to challenge SRL at WW. The fact that you were summarily corrected about that false context didn't change a thing for you, so context doesn't really matter to you.
It would a great win from Pacquiao but again it shows how flaw and weak 147 is. Spence losing to 42 year old part time Pacquiao should be embarrassing.
Or it can just mean Pac is that special that even the best of this generation although are great just can't compete with a rare fighter that only comes once in a century. Maybe..
Imagine Sugar Ray Leonard beating Hector Camacho. Or Chavez Sr. beating Oscar De La Hoya.
An old ATG with one foot out of the door beating the young ATG caliber man in his prime.
Would be one of the greatest wins in boxing history and the biggest embarrassment ever as well.
I don't know how you damage control that for Spence. He's not young enough to kick-start like Canelo was. Look at Thurman for example. He still hasn't fought since and is completely, utterly, irrelevant in boxing now.
Or it can just mean Pac is that special that even the best of this generation although are great just can't compete with a rare fighter that only comes once in a century. Maybe..
i love Pacquiao and he’s a legend but Spence is far from great. I want Pacquiao to throw a monkey wrench in the welterweight division.
I wouldn’t mind seeing Spence lose to Pacquiao and Crawford lose to Porter so it puts this myth that Crawford and Spence were special fighters
The only problem I have with this fight is it goes the distance, Pac-Man is going to get robbed. Does anyone actually believe that PBC is going to allow their biggest future investment star to lose on the cards just ask Castano about that 117-111 scorecard. Especially wen Pac-Man has mentioned retirement after this fight. May the best man win, that’s how it should be
Comment