there is absolutely no reason to include mismatches just because one person requested them, just a waste of time and space.
Duly noted, man. It's been a matter of some debate since we've been doing the Pick Em, but it's an unfortunate fact of life that all too often the biggest name fighters on any given week are also the ones in mismatches. It's often a case of striking a balance between including fights that people are gonna be watching and those that have an outcome that's in some doubt.
That said we do sometimes see some significant upsets and even when we got some absurdly wide favourites as with this week, there's still points to be gained on method and detail of victory.
Duly noted, man. It's been a matter of some debate since we've been doing the Pick Em, but it's an unfortunate fact of life that all too often the biggest name fighters on any given week are also the ones in mismatches. It's often a case of striking a balance between including fights that people are gonna be watching and those that have an outcome that's in some doubt.
That said we do sometimes see some significant upsets and even when we got some absurdly wide favourites as with this week, there's still points to be gained on method and detail of victory.
Just pick the best 2-3 fights per weekend if i was you.
If it happens to be a busy weekend like today, then exclude the mismatches even if they are for a title
Comment