Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Nards resume kinda sucks

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by ИATAS206 View Post
    If Bernard's resume isn't that good, then no one else in the game is either because his resume is better than 99.999% of any active fighter today.
    ^^truth^^

    if bhop's resume isnt good, then just about 90% of everyone elses must suck

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by ИATAS206 View Post
      If Bernard's resume isn't that good, then no one else in the game is either because his resume is better than 99.999% of any active fighter today.
      For every Joe Calzaghe on his record he's got 10 Moradde Hakkars.

      TS is right.

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by chicano79us View Post
        I agree with majority of the stuff you said.

        Pavlik isn't great imo. Johnson though has a lot of loses is still a tough fighter.
        His resume is better than Calzaghe's but like you said most of his big wins are severely overrated.
        Thanks man for your honest opinion.
        Nard is a very good fighter but his resume is a sham with big names on it but those big names gave Nard all the advantages.
        It was at the weight HE WANTED.

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by Burner, ATG View Post
          I dont think a Wlad Klit fan should comment on this........or a Roy Jones fan for that matter considering Hops has better resumes then both combined.
          Former Heavyweight Champ, while B-Hop still aiming for Cruiser.

          To the Thread Starter, B-Hop has an impressive resume. He was underdog against fighters like Trinidad, Tarver, and Pavlik and beat them all up like they were a bunch of kids.

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by reedickyaluss View Post
            Why before Roy? Bernard fought Tarver AFTER Roy.

            Yes it is opinion based, and no Ill stay.
            This is about Tarver allegedly being "elite"...

            Who cares when Hopkins fought him?

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by JACK D. RIPPER View Post
              This is about Tarver allegedly being "elite"...

              Who cares when Hopkins fought him?
              Then why include his fights only before Roy?

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by Kevin Jesus View Post
                Former Heavyweight Champ, while B-Hop still aiming for Cruiser.

                To the Thread Starter, B-Hop has an impressive resume. He was underdog against fighters like Trinidad, Tarver, and Pavlik and beat them all up like they were a bunch of kids.
                Lacy was heavy favourite against Joe Calzaghe,soon as he whoops him,Lacy is overrated anyway.
                They all had to blow up to face Nard

                Comment


                  #28
                  Name me 2 current fighters with a better resume.

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by street bully View Post
                    Name me 2 current fighters with a better resume.
                    Take out the blown up boxers and his resume is ****.

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by reedickyaluss View Post
                      Then why include his fights only before Roy?
                      Thats my whole point. Roy is the only decent name on his resume.

                      So who cares when Hopkins fought him.

                      Tarver is not elite. Is that clear enough now?

                      Or are you drunk at the job again?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP